Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460462›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2020

Minimal under-correction gives better outcomes following total knee arthroplasty in severe varus knees-myth or reality?-analysis of one hundred sixty two knees with varus greater than fifteen degrees.

Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran, Dhanasekara Raja Palanisami, Rajkumar Natesan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Challenging the neutral axis: 15-year results of under-corrected varus in total knee arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. A new parameter in the era of robotic total knee arthroplasty: Coronal alignment at 90° of flexion impacts clinical outcomes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Indian orthopaedics: the past, present, and future.International orthopaedics · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raja Bhaskara RajasekaranDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India. rajalibra299@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0378-7411
Dhanasekara Raja PalanisamiDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.
Rajkumar NatesanDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.
Shanmuganathan RajasekaranDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the studyTo document and compare the functional outcome of neutral alignment and under-correction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in severe varus knees of more than 15° at three and 12 months post-surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred twenty-four consecutive patients (163 TKAs) of an average age of 61.9 years (52-79) with a pre-operative varus more than 15° were managed with jig-based TKA. Based on the post-operative mechanical femorotibial alignment (FTMA), they were categorised into three groups, namely neutral (180 + 3

resultsAt three months, knees in the mild varus group (n = 88) had the best results with an Oxford knee score of 41.76 + 1.44 and a WOMAC score of 19.29 + 2.93 compared to the severe varus group and the neutral alignment group which had Oxford knee scores (OKS) of 37.43 + 2.51 and 31.91 + 3.51 and WOMAC scores of 22.57 + 1.51 and 24.46 + 4.15 respectively. However at 12 months, knees in all the groups (neutral, mild varus, severe varus) had similar good functional outcomes with OKS of 39.08 + 1.68, 39.24 + 1.88, 39.29 + 1.11 and WOMAC scores of 17.42 + 2.15, 16.48 + 2.11, 16.14 + 1.21 respectively. A scatter plot done for post-operative FTMA and the functional outcome score for both scores showed a bell curve with the best outcome corresponding to a FTMA of 175° at 3 months and equal distribution for both scores at 12 months.

conclusionThe results of our study showed that minimal under-correction gave superior functional outcomes at three months. But this advantage was temporary and both, under-correction and neutral alignment achieved equally good outcomes at one year. Considering the increased prosthesis longevity associated with neutral alignment, we propose that neutral alignment must be aimed for during TKA for knees with severe varus. STUDY

designProspective study.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone MalalignmentFemaleGenu VarumHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeNeutral alignmentOxford knee scoreTotal knee arthroplastyUnder-correctionWOMAC

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.