ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019
Surgical staging in endometrial cancer.
Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic determinants of survival in early-stage endometrial cancer: A retrospective analysis.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Constructing a prediction model for lymph node metastasis in patients with incidental finding of endometrial cancer based on Fully-Connected Network.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Improved preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinoma patients: external validation of the ENDORISK Bayesian network model in a large population-based case series.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Surgical Staging for High-Risk Groups of Endometrial Carcinoma Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Application of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Rapid Detection and In Situ Diagnosis in Clinical Oncology.Cancers · 2022Review
- COMPARISON OF TVUS, MRI, AND FROZEN SECTION METHODS IN PREOPERATIVE DETECTION OF MYOMETRIAL INVASION IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER.Acta clinica Croatica · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Challenges Posed by Embryonic and Anatomical Factors in Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Sentinel lymph node intraoperative analysis in endometrial cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Article
- [Non endometroid endometrial cancer guidelines evaluation: A multicentric retrospective study].Bulletin du cancer · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In several malignancies, it has been demonstrated that the lymph nodal status is the most important pathologic factor affecting prognosis and giving the indication to further adjuvant treatment. The surgical assessment of the lymph nodal status in endometrial cancer is debated since 30 years. Recently, the sentinel lymph node mapping is rapidly gaining clinical acceptance in endometrial cancer. The adoption of Indocyanine Green as a safe and user friendly tracer for sentinel lymph node mapping increased the speed to which this procedure is getting applied in clinical practice. As a consequence of this rapid growth, several fundamental questions have been raised and are still debatable. In this manuscript, we discuss the importance of a known pathological lymph nodal status, the technique of the sentinel lymph node mapping with the reported false negative rates and detection rates according to the different tracers adopted, and the clinical scenarios in which a sentinel lymph node mapping could be employed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.