Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460393›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Biomechanical and neurocognitive performance outcomes of walking with transtibial limb loss while challenged by a concurrent task.

Alison L Pruziner, Emma P Shaw, Jeremy C Rietschel, Brad D Hendershot, Matthew W Miller, Erik J Wolf, Bradley D Hatfield, Christopher L Dearth, Rodolphe J Gentili

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Measuring mental workload in assistive wearable devices: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alison L PruzinerDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Bethesda, MD, USA. alison.l.pruziner.civ@mail.mil.
Emma P ShawDepartment of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jeremy C RietschelDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Brad D HendershotDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Matthew W MillerCenter for Neuroscience, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Erik J WolfDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Bradley D HatfieldDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Christopher L DearthDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rodolphe J GentiliDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USAuburn University · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · US

Funding

Center for Rehabilitation Science Research HU0001-11-1-0004Center for Rehabilitation Science Research HU0001-15-2-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals who have sustained loss of a lower limb may require adaptations in sensorimotor and control systems to effectively utilize a prosthesis, and the interaction of these systems during walking is not clearly understood for this patient population. The aim of this study was to concurrently evaluate temporospatial gait mechanics and cortical dynamics in a population with and without unilateral transtibial limb loss (TT). Utilizing motion capture and electroencephalography, these outcomes were simultaneously collected while participants with and without TT completed a concurrent task of varying difficulty (low- and high-demand) while seated and walking. All participants demonstrated a wider base of support and more stable gait pattern when walking and completing the high-demand concurrent task. The cortical dynamics were similarly modulated by the task demand for both groups, to include a decrease in the novelty-P3 component and increase in the frontal theta/parietal alpha ratio power when completing the high-demand task, although specific differences were also observed. These findings confirm and extend prior efforts indicating that dual-task walking can negatively affect walking mechanics and/or neurocognitive performance. However, there may be limited additional cognitive and/or biomechanical impact of utilizing a prosthesis in a stable, protected environment in TT who have acclimated to ambulating with a prosthesis. These results highlight the need for future work to evaluate interactions between these cognitive-motor control systems for individuals with more proximal levels of lower limb loss, and in more challenging (ecologically valid) environments.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsAdultAmputeesBiomechanical PhenomenaBrain WavesCerebral CortexEvent-Related Potentials, P300Executive FunctionFemaleGaitHumansLower ExtremityMalePsychomotor PerformanceWalkingYoung AdultBiomechanicsCognitive workloadDual-task walkingElectroencephalogramLimb loss

Identifiers

PMID30460393
OpenAlexW2901134622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.