Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460160›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Automatic segmentation of OCT retinal boundaries using recurrent neural networks and graph search.

Jason Kugelman, David Alonso-Caneiro, Scott A Read, Stephen J Vincent, Michael J Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep learning for optical tweezers.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason KugelmanContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David Alonso-CaneiroContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Scott A ReadContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Stephen J VincentContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Michael J CollinsContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manual segmentation of individual retinal layers within optical coherence tomography (OCT) images is a time-consuming task and is prone to errors. The investigation into automatic segmentation methods that are both efficient and accurate has seen a variety of methods proposed. In particular, recent machine learning approaches have focused on the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Traditionally applied to sequential data, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have recently demonstrated success in the area of image analysis, primarily due to their usefulness to extract temporal features from sequences of images or volumetric data. However, their potential use in OCT retinal layer segmentation has not previously been reported, and their direct application for extracting spatial features from individual 2D images has been limited. This paper proposes the use of a recurrent neural network trained as a patch-based image classifier (retinal boundary classifier) with a graph search (RNN-GS) to segment seven retinal layer boundaries in OCT images from healthy children and three retinal layer boundaries in OCT images from patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The optimal architecture configuration to maximize classification performance is explored. The results demonstrate that a RNN is a viable alternative to a CNN for image classification tasks in the case where the images exhibit a clear sequential structure. Compared to a CNN, the RNN showed a slightly superior average generalization classification accuracy. Secondly, in terms of segmentation, the RNN-GS performed competitively against a previously proposed CNN based method (CNN-GS) with respect to both accuracy and consistency. These findings apply to both normal and AMD data. Overall, the RNN-GS method yielded superior mean absolute errors in terms of the boundary position with an average error of 0.53 pixels (normal) and 1.17 pixels (AMD). The methodology and results described in this paper may assist the future investigation of techniques within the area of OCT retinal segmentation and highlight the potential of RNN methods for OCT image analysis.

Identifiers

PMID30460160
PMCPMC6238930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.