ArticleBiomedical optics express2018
Automatic segmentation of OCT retinal boundaries using recurrent neural networks and graph search.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing AMD Detection: Dataset Design and Deep Learning Optimization for Unconstrained Retinal Images.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TransDualSegNet: transformer dual segment network for retinal vasculature segmentation in OCT.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Recent Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Innovations for Increased Accessibility and Remote Surveillance.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Boundary-Repairing Dual-Path Network for Retinal Layer Segmentation in OCT Image with Pigment Epithelial Detachment.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Self-supervised contrastive learning improves machine learning discrimination of full thickness macular holes from epiretinal membranes in retinal OCT scans.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Deep learning for optical tweezers.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Review
- Peripheral Choroidal Response to Localized Defocus Blur: Influence of Native Peripheral Aberrations.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Assessment of area and structural irregularity of retinal layers in diabetic retinopathy using machine learning and image processing techniques.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Recurrent and Concurrent Prediction of Longitudinal Progression of Stargardt Atrophy and Geographic Atrophy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Rapid measurement of epidermal thickness in OCT images of skin.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Improving OCT Image Segmentation of Retinal Layers by Utilizing a Machine Learning Based Multistage System of Stacked Multiscale Encoders and Decoders.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- OCT angiography and its retinal biomarkers [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2023Review
- Automated Age-Related Macular Degeneration Detector on Optical Coherence Tomography Images Using Slice-Sum Local Binary Patterns and Support Vector Machine.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Deep learning network with differentiable dynamic programming for retina OCT surface segmentation.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Longitudinal deep network for consistent OCT layer segmentation.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- A Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Retinal Cyst Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Automated assessment of the smoothness of retinal layers in optical coherence tomography images using a machine learning algorithm.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Deep learning-enabled volumetric cone photoreceptor segmentation in adaptive optics optical coherence tomography images of normal and diseased eyes.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness with a deep learning algorithm in ischemic optic neuropathy and optic neuritis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A comparison of deep learning U-Net architectures for posterior segment OCT retinal layer segmentation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The manual segmentation of individual retinal layers within optical coherence tomography (OCT) images is a time-consuming task and is prone to errors. The investigation into automatic segmentation methods that are both efficient and accurate has seen a variety of methods proposed. In particular, recent machine learning approaches have focused on the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Traditionally applied to sequential data, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have recently demonstrated success in the area of image analysis, primarily due to their usefulness to extract temporal features from sequences of images or volumetric data. However, their potential use in OCT retinal layer segmentation has not previously been reported, and their direct application for extracting spatial features from individual 2D images has been limited. This paper proposes the use of a recurrent neural network trained as a patch-based image classifier (retinal boundary classifier) with a graph search (RNN-GS) to segment seven retinal layer boundaries in OCT images from healthy children and three retinal layer boundaries in OCT images from patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The optimal architecture configuration to maximize classification performance is explored. The results demonstrate that a RNN is a viable alternative to a CNN for image classification tasks in the case where the images exhibit a clear sequential structure. Compared to a CNN, the RNN showed a slightly superior average generalization classification accuracy. Secondly, in terms of segmentation, the RNN-GS performed competitively against a previously proposed CNN based method (CNN-GS) with respect to both accuracy and consistency. These findings apply to both normal and AMD data. Overall, the RNN-GS method yielded superior mean absolute errors in terms of the boundary position with an average error of 0.53 pixels (normal) and 1.17 pixels (AMD). The methodology and results described in this paper may assist the future investigation of techniques within the area of OCT retinal segmentation and highlight the potential of RNN methods for OCT image analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.