Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460156›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Polarimetric measurement utility for pre-cancer detection from uterine cervix specimens.

Meredith Kupinski, Matthieu Boffety, François Goudail, Razvigor Ossikovski, Angelo Pierangelo, Jean Rehbinder, Jérémy Vizet, Tatiana Novikova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Meredith KupinskiLPICM, CNRS, École Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, 91128, Palaiseau, France.
Matthieu BoffetyInstitut d'Optique Graduate School, Palaiseau 91128, France.
François GoudailInstitut d'Optique Graduate School, Palaiseau 91128, France.
Razvigor OssikovskiLPICM, CNRS, École Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, 91128, Palaiseau, France.
Angelo PierangeloLPICM, CNRS, École Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, 91128, Palaiseau, France.
Jean RehbinderLPICM, CNRS, École Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, 91128, Palaiseau, France.
Jérémy VizetLPICM, CNRS, École Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, 91128, Palaiseau, France.
Tatiana NovikovaLPICM, CNRS, École Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, 91128, Palaiseau, France.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRLaboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut d’Optique Graduate School · FRLaboratoire Charles Fabry · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior work demonstrated significant contrast in visible wavelength Mueller matrix images for healthy and pre-cancerous regions of excised cervical tissue. This work demonstrates post-processing compressions of the full Mueller matrix that preserve detection performance. The purpose of this post-processing is to understand polarimetric measurement utility for computing mathematical observers and designing future imaging protocols. The detection performance of the full Mueller matrix, and both linear and non-linear parameters of the Mueller matrix will be compared. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, otherwise known as the

Identifiers

PMID30460156
PMCPMC6238933
OpenAlexW2898562510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.