Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460132›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Doppler OCT clutter rejection using variance minimization and offset extrapolation.

Adil Akif, Konrad Walek, Collin Polucha, Jonghwan Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adil AkifCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Konrad WalekDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Collin PoluchaCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Jonghwan LeeCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA.

Funding

Microscopic imaging of neuro-capillary coupling in brain cortexR00EB014879 · NIBIB · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, JONGHWAN · 2016 to 2018
$742k
NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB014879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doppler optical coherence tomography (OCT) is widely used for high-resolution mapping of flow velocities and is based on analysis of temporal changes in the phase of an OCT signal (i.e., how fast the OCT signal rotates in the complex plane). Determination of the rate of phase change or rotation speed critically depends on the center of rotation. Here, we demonstrate the bias in high-pass filtering, the current widely used method to determine the center of rotation, and propose two advanced methods for Doppler OCT clutter rejection. The bias in the high-pass filtering method becomes increasingly significant with lower velocities or larger signal noise. Two novel methods based on variance minimization and offset extrapolation can potentially reduce this bias and thereby improve the accuracy of Doppler OCT measurements of flow velocities, even for low-velocity and/or high-noise signals. The two novel methods and the current standard method (high-pass filtering) have been tested in combination with several currently used velocity measurement algorithms: Kasai, autocorrelation function fitting, and maximum likelihood estimation. The newly proposed methods are shown to improve the accuracy in both the center of rotation and resultant velocity by up to 60 percentage points and reduce the flow conservation error by 30% when applied to

Identifiers

PMID30460132
PMCPMC6238902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.