ArticleBiomedical optics express2018
Doppler OCT clutter rejection using variance minimization and offset extrapolation.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Near-lifespan longitudinal tracking of brain microvascular morphology, topology, and flow in male mice.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Investigating the correlation between early vascular alterations and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease in mice with SD-OCT.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Validation of red blood cell flux and velocity estimations based on optical coherence tomography intensity fluctuations.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Optical coherence tomography velocimetry based on decorrelation estimation of phasor pair ratios (DEPPAIR).Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Doppler optical coherence tomography (OCT) is widely used for high-resolution mapping of flow velocities and is based on analysis of temporal changes in the phase of an OCT signal (i.e., how fast the OCT signal rotates in the complex plane). Determination of the rate of phase change or rotation speed critically depends on the center of rotation. Here, we demonstrate the bias in high-pass filtering, the current widely used method to determine the center of rotation, and propose two advanced methods for Doppler OCT clutter rejection. The bias in the high-pass filtering method becomes increasingly significant with lower velocities or larger signal noise. Two novel methods based on variance minimization and offset extrapolation can potentially reduce this bias and thereby improve the accuracy of Doppler OCT measurements of flow velocities, even for low-velocity and/or high-noise signals. The two novel methods and the current standard method (high-pass filtering) have been tested in combination with several currently used velocity measurement algorithms: Kasai, autocorrelation function fitting, and maximum likelihood estimation. The newly proposed methods are shown to improve the accuracy in both the center of rotation and resultant velocity by up to 60 percentage points and reduce the flow conservation error by 30% when applied to
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.