Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460100›Full record

ReviewAnimal cells and systems2018

Exploring glia to better understand Alzheimer's disease.

Yoo Sung Kim, Hae Myeong Jung, Bo-Eun Yoon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal cells and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Ergothioneine-rich water extracts ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Screening of [ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rejuvenating aged microglia by p16Molecular neurodegeneration · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yoo Sung KimDepartment of Molecular Biology, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
Hae Myeong JungDepartment of Molecular Biology, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
Bo-Eun YoonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amyloid-β (Aβ) hypothesis has been the leading explanation for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The most common traits of AD are cognitive impairments and memory loss, which are associated with the accumulation of Aβ. Aβ aggregates activate glial cells, which in turn remove Aβ. Because microglia act as immune cells in the brain, most glia-related studies of AD have focused primarily on this cell type. However, astrocytes, another type of glial cell, also participate in the brain immune system, synaptic formation, brain homeostasis, and various other brain functions. Accordingly, many studies on the underlying mechanisms of AD have investigated not only neurons but also glial cells. Although these studies suggest that microglia and astrocytes are effective targets for AD therapeutics, other recent studies have raised questions regarding whether microglial cells and/or astrocytes serve a neuroprotective or neurotoxic function in AD. To gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of AD and identify novel targets for AD treatment, in this review, we consider the role of both microglia and astrocytes in AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseastrocytesmicroglianeuroglia

Identifiers

PMID30460100
PMCPMC6138241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.