ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery
A Randomized Study Comparing Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy versus Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in the Management of Hydrocephalus Due to Tuberculous Meningitis.
Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- A clinical practice guideline for tuberculous meningitis.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2026Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of flexible versus rigid endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric and adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- Success and complication rates of endoscopic third ventriculostomy for tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric and adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical interventions for communicating hydrocephalus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Noncommunicating Hydrocephalus Caused by Aseptic Meningitis Can Be Treated With Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy.Journal of medical cases · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy for the Management of Obstructive Hydrocephalus in Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Journal of neurological surgery reports · 2024Article
- Factors associated with in-hospital mortality in HIV-infected children treated for tuberculous meningitis hydrocephalus.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt versus endoscopic third ventriculostomy in managing hydrocephalus due to tuberculous meningitis: a randomized controlled trial with a 30-day follow-up.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- The Neuro-Ophthalmology of Tuberculosis.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2024Review
- Symptomatic central nervous system tuberculosis and human herpesvirus-6 coinfection with associated hydrocephalus managed with endoscopic third ventriculostomy: A case report and review of human herpesvirus-6 neuropathology.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Review
- Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity syndrome in tuberculous meningitis with paradoxical reaction.International journal of surgery case reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Inflammatory hydrocephalus.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021Article
- Neurotuberculosis: an update.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2021Review
- Inflammation in acquired hydrocephalus: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2020Review
- Role of Surgical Procedures (VP Shunt and ETV) in Tuberculous Meningitis with Hydrocephalus (TBMH): A Systematic Review.Journal of pediatric neurosciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) versus ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt in the treatment of hydrocephalus in tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and to assess clinical and radiological profiles of patients with TBM that would be better suited to either VP shunt or ETV.
methodsThis study was a single-center randomized prospective study on 52 patients with TBM hydrocephalus in the pediatric age group (<18 years of age). Patients included in the study were randomized into undergo either VP shunt or ETV. Both groups were followed up for a minimum of 5 months and assessed for success and failure rates as well as procedural complications and neurologic sequelae.
resultsTwenty-six patients underwent ETV with a success rate of 65.4% with six of nine failures occurring within the first 16 days after surgery (median time to failure - 3 days). In the VP shunt group, there was a success rate of 61.54% and a median time to failure of 50 days. Modified Vellore grading was found to be a significant factor in determining outcome in both ETV and VP shunt groups with high-grade TBM consistently associated with poor outcome (odds ratio = 4.2).
conclusionsETV can be performed effectively in young children including infants, as well as those with communicating hydrocephalus, high cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell counts, and protein levels with a lower rate of failure than that of VP shunt. Hence, ETV should be attempted as the first-choice CSF diversion procedure in hydrocephalus secondary to TBM where technical expertise and experience with this procedure is available as it avoids the myriad of lifelong complications associated with shunts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.