ArticleEvolutionary applications2018
Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Location and habitat specificity structure benthic microbial assemblages in a temperate seagrass ecosystem.mSphere · 2026Article
- Desiccation to DNA: Bulk DNA Metabarcoding of Macroinvertebrate Egg Banks via Sugar-Flotation Enhances Biodiversity Surveys of Dry Salt Lakes.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Understanding biological control function and trophic interaction dynamics of an artificially released predatory bug by DNA metabarcoding.Insect science · 2026Article
- Spatial Complexity and Rare-Taxon Turnover Structures Benthic Coral Reef eDNA Communities.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Improved characterisation of coral-associated fungal communities using host DNA depletion and a novel ITS primer.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Patagonian Fjords/Channels vs. Open Ocean: Phytoplankton Molecular Diversity on Southern Chilean Coast.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive DNA Barcode Reference Library for the Macroinvertebrates of Scottish Seagrass Beds Using Oxford Nanopore Flongle Flowcells.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- DNA Metabarcoding as a Tool to Study Plankton Responses to Warming and Salinity Change in Mesocosms.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- A Double-Gene Metabarcoding Approach for the Authentication of Shrimp Surimi-Based Products.Genes · 2025Article
- Identification of potential insect ecological interactions using a metabarcoding approach.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Article
- Multi-marker DNA metabarcoding for precise species identification in ichthyoplankton samples.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Development of environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for marine mollusks and comparison with published primers.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Taxonize-gb: A tool for filtering GenBank non-redundant databases based on taxonomy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- VESPA: an optimized protocol for accurate metabarcoding-based characterization of vertebrate eukaryotic endosymbiont and parasite assemblages.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Lack of local genetic representation in one of the regions with the highest bird species richness, the Peruvian Amazonia.PloS one · 2024Article
- Assessing the Seasonal and Spatial Dynamics of Zooplankton through DNA Metabarcoding in a Temperate Estuary.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Using eRNA/eDNA metabarcoding to detect community-level impacts of nanoplastic exposure to benthic estuarine ecosystems.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabarcoding combines DNA barcoding with high-throughput sequencing, often using one genetic marker to understand complex and taxonomically diverse samples. However, species-level identification depends heavily on the choice of marker and the selected primer pair, often with a trade-off between successful species amplification and taxonomic resolution. We present a versatile metabarcoding protocol for biomonitoring that involves the use of two barcode markers (COI and 18S) and four primer pairs in a single high-throughput sequencing run, via sample multiplexing. We validate the protocol using a series of 24 mock zooplanktonic communities incorporating various levels of genetic variation. With the use of a single marker and single primer pair, the highest species recovery was 77%. With all three COI fragments, we detected 62%-83% of species across the mock communities, while the use of the 18S fragment alone resulted in the detection of 73%-75% of species. The species detection level was significantly improved to 89%-93% when both markers were used. Furthermore, multiplexing did not have a negative impact on the proportion of reads assigned to each species and the total number of species detected was similar to when markers were sequenced alone. Overall, our metabarcoding approach utilizing two barcode markers and multiple primer pairs per barcode improved species detection rates over a single marker/primer pair by 14% to 35%, making it an attractive and relatively cost-effective method for biomonitoring natural zooplankton communities. We strongly recommend combining evolutionary independent markers and, when necessary, multiple primer pairs per marker to increase species detection (i.e., reduce false negatives) in metabarcoding studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.