Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459588›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2018

Most Popular Signal Processing Methods in Motor-Imagery BCI: A Review and Meta-Analysis.

Piotr Wierzgała, Dariusz Zapała, Grzegorz M Wojcik, Jolanta Masiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating the Feasibility of Visual Imagery for an EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Language Model-Guided Classifier Adaptation for Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication.Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Piotr WierzgałaDepartment of Neuroinformatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Computer Science, Institute of Computer Science Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland.
Dariusz ZapałaDepartment of Experimental Psychology The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Grzegorz M WojcikDepartment of Neuroinformatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Computer Science, Institute of Computer Science Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland.
Jolanta MasiakNeurophysiological Independent Unit of the Department of Psychiatry Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) constitute an alternative channel of communication between humans and environment. There are a number of different technologies which enable the recording of brain activity. One of these is electroencephalography (EEG). The most common EEG methods include interfaces whose operation is based on changes in the activity of Sensorimotor Rhythms (SMR) during imagery movement, so-called Motor Imagery BCI (MIBCI).The present article is a review of 131 articles published from 1997 to 2017 discussing various procedures of data processing in MIBCI. The experiments described in these publications have been compared in terms of the methods used for data registration and analysis. Some of the studies (76 reports) were subjected to meta-analysis which showed corrected average classification accuracy achieved in these studies at the level of 51.96%, a high degree of heterogeneity of results (

Indexed as

brain-computer interfaceselectroencephalographymeta-analysismotor imagerysensorimotor rhythms

Identifiers

PMID30459588
PMCPMC6232268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.