Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459544›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Automatic Human Sleep Stage Scoring Using Deep Neural Networks.

Alexander Malafeev, Dmitry Laptev, Stefan Bauer, Ximena Omlin, Aleksandra Wierzbicka, Adam Wichniak, Wojciech Jernajczyk, Robert Riener, Joachim Buhmann, Peter Achermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. U-Sleep's resilience to AASM guidelines.NPJ digital medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Automated Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexander MalafeevChronobiology and Sleep Research, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dmitry LaptevInformation Science and Engineering, Institute for Machine Learning, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefan BauerInformation Science and Engineering, Institute for Machine Learning, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ximena OmlinNeuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Aleksandra WierzbickaSleep Disorders Center, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Adam WichniakThird Department of Psychiatry and Sleep Disorders Center, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech JernajczykSleep Disorders Center, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Robert RienerNeuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Joachim BuhmannInformation Science and Engineering, Institute for Machine Learning, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Peter AchermannChronobiology and Sleep Research, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of sleep stages is the first and an important step in the quantitative analysis of polysomnographic recordings. Sleep stage scoring relies heavily on visual pattern recognition by a human expert and is time consuming and subjective. Thus, there is a need for automatic classification. In this work we developed machine learning algorithms for sleep classification: random forest (RF) classification based on features and artificial neural networks (ANNs) working both with features and raw data. We tested our methods in healthy subjects and in patients. Most algorithms yielded good results comparable to human interrater agreement. Our study revealed that deep neural networks (DNNs) working with raw data performed better than feature-based methods. We also demonstrated that taking the local temporal structure of sleep into account a priori is important. Our results demonstrate the utility of neural network architectures for the classification of sleep.

Indexed as

artificial neural networksautomatic scoringdeep learningEEGfeaturesrandom forestraw datasleep

Identifiers

PMID30459544
PMCPMC6232272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.