ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018
A Characterization of Brain-Computer Interface Performance Trade-Offs Using Support Vector Machines and Deep Neural Networks to Decode Movement Intent.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reanimation in Tetraplegia: Restoring Cortical Control of Functional Movement in Humans With Quadriplegia
High Definition Neuromuscular Stimulation in Tetraplegia
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use and evaluation of assistive technologies for upper limb function in tetraplegia.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2022Pooled it
- A Bidirectional Neural Interface With Direct On-Device Neuromorphic Decoding for Closed-Loop Optogenetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- PQ-Neurolink: latency-aware post-quantum-ready secure communication for distributed brain-computer interfaces.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
- A low-latency neural inference framework for real-time handwriting recognition from EEG signals on an edge device.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 5-year follow-up of a fully implanted brain-computer interface in a spinal cord injury patient.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Decoding Continuous Tracking Eye Movements from Cortical Spiking Activity.International journal of neural systems · 2025Article
- End-to-end deep learning approach to mouse behavior classification from cortex-wide calcium imaging.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Similar neural states, but dissimilar decoding patterns for motor control in parietal cortex.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Neural Decoding for Intracortical Brain-Computer Interfaces.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Review
- Real-time brain-machine interface in non-human primates achieves high-velocity prosthetic finger movements using a shallow feedforward neural network decoder.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Deep Convolutional Neural Network for EEG-Based Motor Decoding.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Neural Decoders Using Reinforcement Learning in Brain Machine Interfaces: A Technical Review.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
- Increasing Robustness of Brain-Computer Interfaces Through Automatic Detection and Removal of Corrupted Input Signals.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Summary of over Fifty Years with Brain-Computer Interfaces-A Review.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Classifying Intracortical Brain-Machine Interface Signal Disruptions Based on System Performance and Applicable Compensatory Strategies: A Review.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laboratory demonstrations of brain-computer interface (BCI) systems show promise for reducing disability associated with paralysis by directly linking neural activity to the control of assistive devices. Surveys of potential users have revealed several key BCI performance criteria for clinical translation of such a system. Of these criteria, high accuracy, short response latencies, and multi-functionality are three key characteristics directly impacted by the neural decoding component of the BCI system, the algorithm that translates neural activity into control signals. Building a decoder that simultaneously addresses these three criteria is complicated because optimizing for one criterion may lead to undesirable changes in the other criteria. Unfortunately, there has been little work to date to quantify how decoder design simultaneously affects these performance characteristics. Here, we systematically explore the trade-off between accuracy, response latency, and multi-functionality for discrete movement classification using two different decoding strategies-a support vector machine (SVM) classifier which represents the current state-of-the-art for discrete movement classification in laboratory demonstrations and a proposed deep neural network (DNN) framework. We utilized historical intracortical recordings from a human tetraplegic study participant, who imagined performing several different hand and finger movements. For both decoders, we found that response time increases (i.e., slower reaction) and accuracy decreases as the number of functions increases. However, we also found that both the increase of response times and the decline in accuracy with additional functions is less for the DNN than the SVM. We also show that data preprocessing steps can affect the performance characteristics of the two decoders in drastically different ways. Finally, we evaluated the performance of our tetraplegic participant using the DNN decoder in real-time to control functional electrical stimulation (FES) of his paralyzed forearm. We compared his performance to that of able-bodied participants performing the same task, establishing a quantitative target for ideal BCI-FES performance on this task. Cumulatively, these results help quantify BCI decoder performance characteristics relevant to potential users and the complex interactions between them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.