Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459480›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary biology2018

Extrinsic Mortality Can Shape Life-History Traits, Including Senescence.

Maciej J Dańko, Oskar Burger, Krzysztof Argasiński, Jan Kozłowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Rapamycin supplementation ofRoyal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aging as a consequence of selection to reduce the environmental risk of dying.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Coevolution of body size and metabolic rate in vertebrates: a life-history perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Phenotypic plasticity of senescence inRoyal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maciej J Dańko1Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
Oskar Burger1Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
Krzysztof Argasiński2Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Jan Kozłowski3Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Williams' hypothesis is one of the most widely known ideas in life history evolution. It states that higher adult mortality should lead to faster and/or earlier senescence. Theoretically derived gradients, however, do not support this prediction. Increased awareness of this fact has caused a crisis of misinformation among theorists and empirical ecologists. We resolve this crisis by outlining key issues in the measurement of fitness, assumptions of density dependence, and their effect on extrinsic mortality. The classic gradients apply only to a narrow range of ecological contexts where density-dependence is either absent or present but with unrealistic stipulations. Re-deriving the classic gradients, using a more appropriate measure of fitness and incorporating density, shows that broad ecological contexts exist where Williams' hypothesis is supported.

Indexed as

Density-dependenceFitness measuresMalthusian parameterNet reproductive rateReproductive valueResource allocationr/K selectionSelection gradientsWilliams hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID30459480
PMCPMC6223763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.