ArticleScientific reports2018
3D Inkjet Printing of Complex, Cell-Laden Hydrogel Structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Bioinks for 4D Bioprinting: Requirements, Design, and Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Functional Nano-to-Microstructures by Jet Printing and Direct Ink Writing.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Cell-Laden Supramolecular and Covalent Polymer Hydrogels for High-Shear Delivery: A Design of Experiments Approach.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Liquid-in-Liquid Prints: High-Density Biochemically Encoded Information Preserved in Microdroplet Arrays.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- High-Resolution Heterogeneous Hydrogel Printing Using a Home Projector.Small methods · 2025Article
- Revisiting the biophysical aspects of extracellular-matrix-mimicking hydrogels: what cells seeBiomaterials science · 2025Review
- Particle-based hydrogel inks and support matrices for biofabricating structural complexity, soluble gradients, and cell-lined channels in fully granular bioprinted systems.Biofabrication · 2025Article
- Review
- Recapitulating the bone extracellular matrix through 3D bioprinting using various crosslinking chemistries.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Commercially available bioinks and state-of-the-art lab-made formulations for bone tissue engineering: A comprehensive review.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Zonal patterning of extracellular matrix and stromal cell populations along a perfusable cellular microchannel.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
- Recapitulating Glioma Stem Cell Niches Using 3D Spheroid Models for Glioblastoma Research.Biosensors · 2024Review
- 3D Bioprinting in Cancer Modeling and Biomedicine: From Print Categories to Biological Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Bioinks and biofabrication techniques for biosensors development: A review.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Overview of research on additive manufacturing of hydrogel-assisted lab-on-chip platforms for cell engineering applications in photodynamic therapy research.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Review
- Review on Engineering of Bone Scaffolds Using Conventional and Additive Manufacturing Technologies.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Review
- Light-Assisted 3D-Printed Hydrogels for Antibacterial Applications.Small science · 2024Article
- Zonal Patterning of Extracellular Matrix and Stromal Cell Populations Along a Perfusable Cellular Microchannel.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Advanced 3D imaging and organoid bioprinting for biomedical research and therapeutic applications.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024Review
- Advancements of 3D bioprinting in regenerative medicine: Exploring cell sources for organ fabrication.Heliyon · 2024Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inkjet printing is widely considered a promising strategy to pattern hydrogels and living cells into three-dimensional (3D) constructs that structurally resemble tissues in our body. However, this approach is currently constrained by the limited control over multi-component deposition: the variable droplet ejection characteristics of different bioinks and dispensing units make synchronized printing very challenging. This invariably results in artificial tissues that lack the complexity and function of their native counterparts. By careful optimization of the printing parameters for two different bioink formulations, here we report the inkjet-based 3D-patterning of hydrogels according to relatively complex blueprints. 3D printing of bioinks containing living cells resulted in high-resolution, multi-component living constructs. Finally, we describe a sacrificial material approach to inkjet print perfuseable channels for improved long-term cultures of larger samples. We believe that this work provides a foundation for the generation of more complex 3D tissue models by inkjet printing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.