Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459412›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The shift in ocular dominance from short-term monocular deprivation exhibits no dependence on duration of deprivation.

Seung Hyun Min, Alex S Baldwin, Alexandre Reynaud, Robert F Hess

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of fasting on short-term visual plasticity in adult humans.The European journal of neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seung Hyun MinMcGill Vision Research, Dept, Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. seung.min@mail.mcgill.ca.
Alex S BaldwinMcGill Vision Research, Dept, Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Alexandre ReynaudMcGill Vision Research, Dept, Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Robert F HessMcGill Vision Research, Dept, Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deprivation of visual information from one eye for a 120-minute period in normal adults results in a temporary strengthening of the patched eye's contribution to binocular vision. This plasticity for ocular dominance in adults has been demonstrated by binocular rivalry as well as binocular fusion tasks. Here, we investigate how its dynamics depend on the duration of the monocular deprivation. Using a binocular combination task, we measure the magnitude and recovery of ocular dominance change after durations of monocular deprivation ranging from 15 to 300 minutes. Surprisingly, our results show that the dynamics are of an all-or-none form. There was virtually no significant dependence on the duration of the initial deprivation.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesDominance, OcularFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSensory DeprivationVision, MonocularVisual CortexVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30459412
PMCPMC6244356
OpenAlexW2901371742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.