Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459346›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

High-throughput sequencing for the molecular diagnosis of Usher syndrome reveals 42 novel mutations and consolidates CEP250 as Usher-like disease causative.

Carla Fuster-García, Gema García-García, Teresa Jaijo, Neus Fornés, Carmen Ayuso, Miguel Fernández-Burriel, Ana Sánchez-De la Morena, Elena Aller, José M Millán

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Ciliary Defects in Inherited Retinal Diseases.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Mutation of beta-tubulin 4B gene (Molecular vision · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Novel Variant inCells · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Novel Missense and Splice Site Mutations inFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carla Fuster-GarcíaGrupo de Investigación en Biomedicina Molecular, Celular y Genómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain.
Gema García-GarcíaGrupo de Investigación en Biomedicina Molecular, Celular y Genómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain. gegarcia@ciberer.es.
Teresa JaijoGrupo de Investigación en Biomedicina Molecular, Celular y Genómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain.
Neus FornésGrupo de Investigación en Biomedicina Molecular, Celular y Genómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain.
Carmen AyusoCIBER de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Fernández-BurrielUnidad de Genética, Hospital de Mérida, Mérida, Badajoz, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2648-2370
Ana Sánchez-De la MorenaServicio de Oftalmología, Hospital de Mérida, Mérida, Badajoz, Spain.
Elena AllerGrupo de Investigación en Biomedicina Molecular, Celular y Genómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain.
José M MillánGrupo de Investigación en Biomedicina Molecular, Celular y Genómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain.
Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESInstituto de Arqueología-Mérida · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ESCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ES

Funding

Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Institute of Health Carlos III) PI16/00425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Usher syndrome is a rare disorder causing retinitis pigmentosa, together with sensorineural hearing loss. Due to the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity of this disease, the best method to screen the causative mutations is by high-throughput sequencing. In this study, we tested a semiconductor chip based sequencing approach with 77 unrelated patients, as a molecular diagnosis routine. In addition, Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification and microarray-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization techniques were applied to detect large rearrangements, and minigene assays were performed to confirm the mRNA processing aberrations caused by splice-site mutations. The designed panel included all the USH causative genes (MYO7A, USH1C, CDH23, PCDH15, USH1G, CIB2, USH2A, ADGRV1, WHRN and CLRN1) as well as four uncertainly associated genes (HARS, PDZD7, CEP250 and C2orf71). The outcome showed an overall mutation detection ratio of 82.8% and allowed the identification of 42 novel putatively pathogenic mutations. Furthermore, we detected two novel nonsense mutations in CEP250 in a patient with a disease mimicking Usher syndrome that associates visual impairment due to cone-rod dystrophy and progressive hearing loss. Therefore, this approach proved reliable results for the molecular diagnosis of the disease and also allowed the consolidation of the CEP250 gene as disease causative for an Usher-like phenotype.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersMutationAutoantigensCell Cycle ProteinsDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMalePedigreePhenotypeUsher SyndromesAutoantigensCell Cycle ProteinsCEP250 protein, humanGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID30459346
PMCPMC6244211
OpenAlexW2901774819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.