Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459313›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Evaluating metabarcoding to analyse diet composition of species foraging in anthropogenic landscapes using Ion Torrent and Illumina sequencing.

Marie-Amélie Forin-Wiart, Marie-Lazarine Poulle, Sylvain Piry, Jean-François Cosson, Claire Larose, Maxime Galan

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dietary Response of Black-Backed Jackals (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Presence ofParasitology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie-Amélie Forin-WiartUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, EA 7510 ESCAPE, UFR de Médecine, 51 rue Cognacq Jay, 51095, Reims Cedex, France. ma.forinw@hotmail.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1996-1907
Marie-Lazarine PoulleUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, EA 7510 ESCAPE, UFR de Médecine, 51 rue Cognacq Jay, 51095, Reims Cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2445-5133
Sylvain PiryCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Université de Montpellier, 755 avenue du Campus Agropolis, CS 300 16, 34988, Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France.
Jean-François CossonUMR BIPAR, Animal Health Laboratory, INRA, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0863-5871
Claire LaroseDIANA PetFood Division, Z.A. du Gohélis, 56250, Elven, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-9596
Maxime GalanCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Université de Montpellier, 755 avenue du Campus Agropolis, CS 300 16, 34988, Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6981-5732

Funding

Conseil Régional Champagne Ardenne (Champage Ardenne Regional Council) D201011937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA metabarcoding of faecal samples is being successfully used to study the foraging niche of species. We assessed the ability of two benchtop high-throughput sequencing (HTS) platforms, to identify a large taxonomic array of food items from domestic cats Felis silvestris catus, including prey and human-related food taxa (pet food and leftovers leaving undetectable solid remains in faeces). Scats from a captive feeding trial (n = 41) and from free-ranging individuals (n = 326) were collected and analysed using a cytb mini-barcode in independent PCR replicates on the Ion PGM and the MiSeq platforms. Outputs from MiSeq were more sensitive and reproducible than those from Ion PGM due to a higher sequencing depth and sequence quality on MiSeq. DNA from intact prey taxa was detected more often (82% of the expected occurrences) than DNA from pet food (54%) and raw fish and meat (31%). We assumed that this variability was linked to different degree of DNA degradation: The Ion PGM detected significantly less human-linked food, birds, field voles, murids and shrews in the field-collected samples than the MiSeq platform. Pooling the replicates from both platforms and filtering the data allowed identification of at least one food item in 87.4% of the field-collected samples. Our DNA metabarcoding approach identified 29 prey taxa, of which 25 to species level (90% of items) including 9 rodents, 3 insectivores, 12 birds and 1 reptile and 33 human-related food taxa of which 23 were identified to genus level (75% of items). Our results demonstrate that using HTS platforms such as MiSeq, which provide reads of sufficiently high quantity and quality, with sufficient numbers of technical replicates, is a robust and non-invasive approach for further dietary studies on animals foraging on a wide range of food items in anthropogenic landscapes.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsCatsComputational BiologyDietDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFecesFeeding BehaviorHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID30459313
PMCPMC6244006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.