Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459223›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Directing Voluntary Temporal Attention Increases Fixational Stability.

Rachel N Denison, Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg, Marisa Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stimulus representations in visual cortex shaped by spatial attention and microsaccades.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Do microsaccades vary with discriminability around the visual field?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel N DenisonDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003 and rachel.denison@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6304-5236
Shlomit Yuval-GreenbergSchool of Psychological Sciences and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6455-7578
Marisa CarrascoDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003 and.ORCID 0000-0002-1002-9056

Funding

Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MOVSHON, J ANTHONY · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
TRAINING IN VISUAL NEUROSCIENCET32EY007136 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI J ANTHONY MOVSHON · 1993 to 2026
$5.3M
Temporal Dynamics of Visual Perception and AttentionR01EY019693 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2010 to 2022
$4.0M
Effects of covert attention on early visionR01EY016200 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2006 to 2013
$1.8M
Dynamics of Temporal AttentionF32EY025533 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI DENISON, RACHEL · 2016 to 2017
$116k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY025533NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016200NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019693NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our visual input is constantly changing, but not all moments are equally relevant. Visual temporal attention, the prioritization of visual information at specific points in time, increases perceptual sensitivity at behaviorally relevant times. The dynamic processes underlying this increase are unclear. During fixation, humans make small eye movements called microsaccades, and inhibiting microsaccades improves perception of brief stimuli. Here, we investigated whether temporal attention changes the pattern of microsaccades in anticipation of brief stimuli. Human observers (female and male) judged stimuli presented within a short sequence. Observers were given either an informative precue to attend to one of the stimuli, which was likely to be probed, or an uninformative (neutral) precue. We found strong microsaccadic inhibition before the stimulus sequence, likely due to its predictable onset. Critically, this anticipatory inhibition was stronger when the first target in the sequence (T1) was precued (task-relevant) than when the precue was uninformative. Moreover, the timing of the last microsaccade before T1 and the first microsaccade after T1 shifted such that both occurred earlier when T1 was precued than when the precue was uninformative. Finally, the timing of the nearest pre- and post-T1 microsaccades affected task performance. Directing voluntary temporal attention therefore affects microsaccades, helping to stabilize fixation at the most relevant moments over and above the effect of predictability. Just as saccading to a relevant stimulus can be an overt correlate of the allocation of spatial attention, precisely timed gaze stabilization can be an overt correlate of the allocation of temporal attention.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalAttentionCuesDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adulteye movementsmicrosaccadesoculomotortemporal attentionvisual perceptionvoluntary attention

Identifiers

PMID30459223
PMCPMC6325259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.