Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459221›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Balancing Prediction and Sensory Input in Speech Comprehension: The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Word Recognition in Context.

Anastasia Klimovich-Gray, Lorraine K Tyler, Billi Randall, Ece Kocagoncu, Barry Devereux, William D Marslen-Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neural Bases of Proactive and Predictive Processing of Meaningful Subword Units in Speech Comprehension.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neural dynamics of semantic composition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anastasia Klimovich-GrayCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6292-6381
Lorraine K TylerCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom lktyler@csl.psychol.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-118X
Billi RandallCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Ece KocagoncuCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6292-7472
Barry DevereuxCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2128-8632
William D Marslen-WilsonCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0690-6308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spoken word recognition in context is remarkably fast and accurate, with recognition times of ∼200 ms, typically well before the end of the word. The neurocomputational mechanisms underlying these contextual effects are still poorly understood. This study combines source-localized electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic (EMEG) measures of real-time brain activity with multivariate representational similarity analysis to determine directly the timing and computational content of the processes evoked as spoken words are heard in context, and to evaluate the respective roles of bottom-up and predictive processing mechanisms in the integration of sensory and contextual constraints. Male and female human participants heard simple (modifier-noun) English phrases that varied in the degree of semantic constraint that the modifier (W1) exerted on the noun (W2), as in pairs, such as "yellow banana." We used gating tasks to generate estimates of the probabilistic predictions generated by these constraints as well as measures of their interaction with the bottom-up perceptual input for W2. Representation similarity analysis models of these measures were tested against electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic brain data across a bilateral fronto-temporo-parietal language network. Consistent with probabilistic predictive processing accounts, we found early activation of semantic constraints in frontal cortex (LBA45) as W1 was heard. The effects of these constraints (at 100 ms after W2 onset in left middle temporal gyrus and at 140 ms in left Heschl's gyrus) were only detectable, however, after the initial phonemes of W2 had been heard. Within an overall predictive processing framework, bottom-up sensory inputs are still required to achieve early and robust spoken word recognition in context.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticipation, PsychologicalBrainComprehensionElectroencephalographyEntropyFemaleMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyMaleNerve NetNeuroimagingPrefrontal CortexRatsRecognition, PsychologySemanticslanguagepredictionRSAspeechtime-courseword recognition

Identifiers

PMID30459221
PMCPMC6335748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.