Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459213›Full record

ArticleGenome research2018

Quantification of somatic mutation flow across individual cell division events by lineage sequencing.

Yehuda Brody, Robert J Kimmerling, Yosef E Maruvka, David Benjamin, Juniper J Elacqua, Nicholas J Haradhvala, Jaegil Kim, Kent W Mouw, Kristjana Frangaj, Amnon Koren and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic methods for measuring DNA replication dynamics.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yehuda BrodyKlarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Robert J KimmerlingMIT Department of Biological Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Yosef E MaruvkaBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
David BenjaminBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Juniper J ElacquaBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Nicholas J HaradhvalaBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Jaegil KimBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Kent W MouwHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Kristjana FrangajDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Amnon KorenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Gad GetzKlarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Scott R ManalisMIT Department of Biological Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Paul C BlaineyBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.

Funding

TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FOX, JAMES G · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
Center for Cell CircuitsRM1HG006193 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BLAINEY, PAUL CLARK, HACOHEN, NIR · 2016 to 2020
$14.9M
MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING GRANTT32GM008313 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI MURTHY, VENKATESH N · 1989 to 2023
$14.6M
Live Cell TranscriptomicsDP2HL141005 · NHLBI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BLAINEY, PAUL CLARK · 2017 to 2017
$2.7M
Multigenerational lineage heterogeneity and metabolic plasticity of CD8 T cellsR21AI110787 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MANALIS, SCOTT R · 2014 to 2015
$429k
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG006193NHLBI NIH HHS DP2 HL141005NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI110787NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES002109NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation data reveal the dynamic equilibrium between DNA damage and repair processes in cells and are indispensable to the understanding of age-related diseases, tumor evolution, and the acquisition of drug resistance. However, available genome-wide methods have a limited ability to resolve rare somatic variants and the relationships between these variants. Here, we present lineage sequencing, a new genome sequencing approach that enables somatic event reconstruction by providing quality somatic mutation call sets with resolution as high as the single-cell level in subject lineages. Lineage sequencing entails sampling single cells from a population and sequencing subclonal sample sets derived from these cells such that knowledge of relationships among the cells can be used to jointly call variants across the sample set. This approach integrates data from multiple sequence libraries to support each variant and precisely assigns mutations to lineage segments. We applied lineage sequencing to a human colon cancer cell line with a DNA polymerase epsilon (

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMutationCell DivisionCell LineDNA Copy Number VariationsGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSingle-Cell AnalysisTime-Lapse Imaging

Identifiers

PMID30459213
PMCPMC6280753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.