Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30459142›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

Monitoring the Control of Sexually Transmissible Infections and Blood-Borne Viruses: Protocol for the Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance (ACCESS).

Denton Callander, Clarissa Moreira, Carol El-Hayek, Jason Asselin, Caroline van Gemert, Lucy Watchirs Smith, Long Nguyen, Wayne Dimech, Douglas Ir Boyle, Basil Donovan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Hepatitis C Cascade of Care for Opioid Agonist Therapy Recipients in Australia.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hepatitis C Cascades: Data to Inform Hepatitis C Elimination in the United States.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Denton Callander *Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4116-4250
Clarissa Moreira *Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9287-735X
Carol El-HayekBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5743-5994
Jason AsselinBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-4816
Caroline van GemertBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4523-0996
Lucy Watchirs SmithKirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-2209
Long NguyenBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-8275
Wayne DimechNational Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3425-9419
Douglas Ir BoyleResearch Information Technology Unit, Health and Biomedical Information Centre, Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-7083
Basil DonovanKirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8851-4126
Mark StoovéBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-1409
Margaret Hellard *Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5055-3266
Rebecca Guy *Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-4634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew biomedical prevention interventions make the control or elimination of some blood-borne viruses (BBVs) and sexually transmissible infections (STIs) increasingly feasible. In response, the World Health Organization and governments around the world have established elimination targets and associated timelines. To monitor progress toward such targets, enhanced systems of data collection are required. This paper describes the Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance (ACCESS).

objectiveThis study aims to establish a national surveillance network designed to monitor public health outcomes and evaluate the impact of strategies aimed at controlling BBVs and STIs.

methodsACCESS is a sentinel surveillance system comprising health services (sexual health clinics, general practice clinics, drug and alcohol services, community-led testing services, and hospital outpatient clinics) and pathology laboratories in each of Australia's 8 states and territories. Scoping was undertaken in each jurisdiction to identify sites that provide a significant volume of testing or management of BBVs or STIs or to see populations with particular risks for these infections ("priority populations"). Nationally, we identified 115 health services and 24 pathology laboratories as relevant to BBVs or STIs; purposive sampling was undertaken. As of March 2018, we had recruited 92.0% (104/113) of health services and 71% (17/24) of laboratories among those identified as relevant to ACCESS. ACCESS is based on the regular and automated extraction of deidentified patient data using specialized software called GRHANITE, which creates an anonymous unique identifier from patient details. This identifier allows anonymous linkage between and within participating sites, creating a national cohort to facilitate epidemiological monitoring and the evaluation of clinical and public health interventions.

resultsBetween 2009 and 2017, 1,171,658 individual patients attended a health service participating in ACCESS network comprising 7,992,241 consultations. Regarding those with unique BBV and STI-related health needs, ACCESS captured data on 366,441 young heterosexuals, 96,985 gay and bisexual men, and 21,598 people living with HIV.

conclusionsACCESS is a unique system with the ability to track efforts to control STIs and BBVs-including through the calculation of powerful epidemiological indicators-by identifying response gaps and facilitating the evaluation of programs and interventions. By anonymously linking patients between and within services and over time, ACCESS has exciting potential as a research and evaluation platform. Establishing a national health surveillance system requires close partnerships across the research, government, community, health, and technology sectors. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/11028.

Indexed as

Australiablood-borne virusespublic healthsentinel surveillancesexually transmissible infections

Identifiers

PMID30459142
PMCPMC6280029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.