Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458877›Full record

Trial reportJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale2018

Effectiveness of discovery learning using a mobile otoscopy simulator on knowledge acquisition and retention in medical students: a randomized controlled trial.

Josie Xu, Paolo Campisi, Vito Forte, Brian Carrillo, Allan Vescan, Ryan Brydges

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Content validity evidence for a simulation-based test of handheld otoscopy skills.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Josie XuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street 3S-438, Toronto, M5G 2C4, Canada. josie.xu@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2096-6382
Paolo CampisiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street 3S-438, Toronto, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Vito ForteDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street 3S-438, Toronto, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Brian CarrilloOtoSim Inc., Toronto, Canada.
Allan VescanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street 3S-438, Toronto, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Ryan BrydgesThe Wilson Centre, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAOTI Lumionics (Canada) · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPortable educational technologies, like simulators, afford students the opportunity to learn independently. A key question in education, is how to pair self-regulated learning (SRL) with direct instruction. A cloud-based portable otoscopy simulator was employed to compare two curricula involving SRL. Pre-clerkship medical students used a prototype smartphone application, a 3D ear attachment and an otoscope to complete either otoscopy curriculum.

methodsPre-clerkship medical students were recruited and randomized to two curriculum designs. The "Discovery then Instruction" group received the simulator one week before a traditional lecture, while the "Instruction then Discovery" group received it after the lecture. To assess participants' ability to identify otoscopic pathology, we used a 100-item test at baseline, post-intervention and 2-week retention time points. Secondary outcomes included self-reported comfort, time spent using the device, and a survey on learning preferences.

resultsThirty-four students completed the study. Analysis of knowledge acquisition and retention showed improvement in scores of both groups and no significant effects of group (F

conclusionsBoth curricular sequences led to improved knowledge scores with no statistically significant knowledge differences. When given minimal guidance, students engaged in discovery learning minimally. There is value in SRL in simulation education, and we plan to further improve our curricular design by considering learner behaviours identified in this study.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementOtoscopesEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsOtolaryngologyOtoscopyProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalDiscovery learningMedical educationOtoscopySimulation

Identifiers

PMID30458877
PMCPMC6247612
OpenAlexW2901899260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.