Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458871›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2018

The multi-biomarker disease activity score tracks response to rituximab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a post hoc analysis of three cohort studies.

Nadia M T Roodenrijs, Maria J H de Hair, Gill Wheater, Mohsen Elshahaly, Janneke Tekstra, Y K Onno Teng, Floris P J G Lafeber, Ching Chang Hwang, Xinyu Liu, Eric H Sasso and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Nadia M T RoodenrijsDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. n.m.t.roodenrijs@umcutrecht.nl.
Maria J H de HairDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gill WheaterDepartment of Biochemistry, The James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesborough, TS4 3BW, UK.
Mohsen ElshahalyDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Suez Canal University, Suez Canal University Circular Road, Ismailia, 411522, Egypt.
Janneke TekstraDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Y K Onno TengDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Floris P J G LafeberDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ching Chang HwangCrescendo Bioscience, 341 Oyster Point Blvd, South San Franscisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Xinyu LiuCrescendo Bioscience, 341 Oyster Point Blvd, South San Franscisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Eric H SassoCrescendo Bioscience, 341 Oyster Point Blvd, South San Franscisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Jacob M van LaarDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Heidelberg University · DEScienceSouth · USJames Cook University Hospital · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLSuez Canal University · EGUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score has been validated as an objective measure of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and shown to track response to treatment with several disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the MBDA score to track response to treatment with rituximab.

methodsData were used from 57 RA patients from three cohorts treated with rituximab 1000 mg and methylprednisolone 100 mg at days 1 and 15. The MBDA score was assessed in serum samples obtained at baseline and 6 months. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated for baseline values, 6-month values, and change from baseline to 6 months (∆), between MBDA score and the following measures: disease activity score assessing 28 joints (DAS28) using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), ESR, (hs)CRP, swollen and tender joint counts assessing 28 joints (SJC28, TJC28), patient visual analogue scale for general health (VAS-GH), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and radiographic progression over 12 months using Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS), as well as six bone turnover markers. Additionally, multivariable linear regression analyses were performed using these measures as dependent variable and the MBDA score as independent variable, with adjustment for relevant confounders. The association between ∆MBDA score and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response at 6 months was assessed with adjustment for relevant confounders.

resultsAt baseline, the median MBDA score and DAS28-ESR were 54.0 (IQR 44.3-70.0) and 6.3 (IQR 5.4-7.1), respectively. MBDA scores correlated significantly with DAS28-ESR, DAS28-hsCRP, ESR and (hs)CRP at baseline and 6 months. ∆MBDA score correlated significantly with changes in these measures. ∆MBDA score was associated with EULAR good or moderate response (adjusted OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81-0.98, p = 0.02). Neither baseline MBDA score nor ΔMBDA score correlated statistically significantly with ∆SHS (n = 11) or change in bone turnover markers (n = 23), although ∆SHS ≥ 5 was observed in 5 (56%) of nine patients with high MBDA scores.

conclusionsWe have shown, for the first time, that the MBDA score tracked disease activity in RA patients treated with rituximab and that change in MBDA score reflected the degree of treatment response.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRituximabTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersRituximabBiomarkersDisease activityMBDA scoreRheumatoid arthritisRituximabTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID30458871
PMCPMC6245625
OpenAlexW2901683875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.