Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458765›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Quality of primary care from patients' perspective: a cross sectional study of outpatients' experience in public health facilities in rural Malawi.

Luckson Dullie, Eivind Meland, Thomas Mildestvedt, Øystein Hetlevik, Sturla Gjesdal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Measuring the quality of primary care in national health surveys: Lessons from Brazil.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. World Family Doctors Day 2019: Reflections from an African perspective.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luckson DullieDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. ldullie@pih.org.
Eivind MelandDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Thomas MildestvedtDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Øystein HetlevikDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Sturla GjesdalDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing patients' experience with primary care complements measures of clinical health outcomes in evaluating service performance. Measuring patients' experience and satisfaction are among Malawi's health sector strategic goals. The purpose of this study was to investigate patients' experience with primary care and to identify associated patients' sociodemographic, healthcare and health characteristics.

methodsThis was a cross sectional survey using questionnaires administered in public primary care facilities in Neno district, Malawi. Data on patients' primary care experience and their sociodemographic, healthcare and health characteristics were collected through face to face interviews using a validated Malawian version of the primary care assessment tool (PCAT-Mw). Mean scores were derived for the following dimensions: first contact access, continuity of care, comprehensiveness, community orientation and total primary care. Linear regression models were used to assess association between primary care dimension scores and patients' characteristics.

resultsFrom 631 completed questionnaires, first contact access, relational continuity and comprehensiveness of services available scored below the defined minimum. Sex, geographical location, self-rated health status, duration of contact with facility and facility affiliation were associated with patients' experience with primary care. These factors explained 10.9% of the variance in total primary care scores; 25.2% in comprehensiveness of services available and 29.4% in first contact access.

conclusionThis paper presents results from the first use of the validated PCAT-Mw. The study provides a baseline indicating areas that need improvement. The results can also be used alongside clinical outcome studies to provide comprehensive evaluation of primary care performance in Malawi.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmbulatory CareCross-Sectional StudiesData AccuracyDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMalawiMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionHealth servicesMalawiPatient experience measurementPrimary carePrimary care assessment toolPrimary care performance

Identifiers

PMID30458765
PMCPMC6245776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.