Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458761›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2018

Reducing wait time from referral to first visit for community outpatient services may contribute to better health outcomes: a systematic review.

Annie K Lewis, Katherine E Harding, David A Snowdon, Nicholas F Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annie K LewisAllied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Level 2/5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia. annie.lewis@easternhealth.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-4956
Katherine E HardingAllied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Level 2/5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia.
David A SnowdonAllied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Level 2/5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia.
Nicholas F TaylorAllied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Level 2/5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia.
La Trobe University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP 1076777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people wait long periods for community outpatient services. However little is known about the impact of waiting from referral to first visit on patient outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate whether waiting for community outpatient services is associated with adverse effects on patient outcomes.

methodsMedline, Embase, Psych Info and CINAHL databases were searched, combining the key concepts of waiting for healthcare and patient outcomes. Studies were included if they reported data comparing health outcomes for patients with different waiting times for the same period. Three reviewers applied inclusion and exclusion criteria to identified studies and assessed quality using the McMaster Critical Review Forms. Levels of evidence were assessed using National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines. Included studies were analysed using a descriptive synthesis, and summarised according to levels of evidence and clinical significance for key outcomes.

resultsFourteen studies that included 69,606 adult patients were selected. Selected studies included patients referred for treatment for musculoskeletal disorders (n = 28,722) or to cardiac rehabilitation (n = 40,884). There was low-level evidence that reduced wait time is associated with moderate improvement in workplace participation for patients seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions; and moderate improvement in exercise tolerance for patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation. There was inconsistent evidence that improvements in quality of life, patient satisfaction and psychological symptoms may be associated with shorter wait times. Pain, function and physical activity outcomes were not associated with wait time.

conclusionsThis review found low-level evidence suggesting an association between early access to community outpatient services and improvement of some patient outcomes. Specifically, shorter wait times from referral to first visit for musculoskeletal pain services may improve patient work participation. Shorter wait times for cardiac rehabilitation may improve patient exercise capacity. The effects of a short wait time for other patient conditions and patient outcomes, including quality of life, psychological symptoms and patient experience, are inconclusive. The modest benefits in health outcomes observed in reducing wait time for community outpatient services suggest that other possible benefits such as increasing patient flow should be explored.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration no: CRD42016047003.

Indexed as

Waiting ListsAdultAmbulatory CareAppointments and SchedulesCardiac RehabilitationExercise ToleranceFacilities and Services UtilizationHumansMusculoskeletal DiseasesPatient Outcome AssessmentQuality of LifeReferral and ConsultationTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeAccessAppointments and schedulesCommunity healthOutpatientsPatient outcomesWaiting lists

Identifiers

PMID30458761
PMCPMC6245820
OpenAlexW2900627719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.