ArticleBMC medical education2018
Institutionalizing healthcare hackathons to promote diversity in collaboration in medicine.
Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attitudes and Knowledge Levels of Optometry Students and Educators Towards Artificial Intelligence in Optometric Practice: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Innovating Challenges and Experiences in Emory Health AI Bias Datathon: Experience Report.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Preparing Generation Z of Health Professions for Artificial Intelligence Revolution Through Hacking Education: An Interventional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- [Research on interdisciplinary issues of artificial intelligence medical devices].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Review
- Design and implementation of a Targeted HealthcaRe InnoVation & Entrepreneurship (THRIVE) fellowship program.PloS one · 2025Article
- Health profession education hackathons: a scoping review of current trends and best practices.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Designathons in health research: a global systematic review.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Fostering interdisciplinary working within global surgery at an undergraduate level: A hackathon based approach.Surgery open science · 2023Article
- Crowdsourcing to support training for public health: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- A hackathon as a tool to enhance research and practice on electronic health record systems' interoperability for chronic disease management and prevention.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Hack your organizational innovation: literature review and integrative model for running hackathons.Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship · 2023Review
- Teaching design thinking as a tool to address complex public health challenges in public health students: a case study.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Assessment of a Crowdsourcing Open Call for Approaches to University Community Engagement and Strategic Planning During COVID-19.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Interdisciplinary Online Hackathons as an Approach to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Proportion, Type, and Characteristics of Physician Entrepreneurship in Massachusetts.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Hacking systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): outcomes of the Waterlupus hackathon.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2020Article
- Hackathons as Stepping Stones in Health Care Innovation: Case Study With Systematic Recommendations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- A Men Who Have Sex With Men-Friendly Doctor Finder Hackathon in Guangzhou, China: Development of a Mobile Health Intervention to Enhance Health Care Utilization.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Healthcare Transformation in Singapore With Artificial Intelligence.Frontiers in digital health · 2020Article
- Surgathon: a new model for creating a surgical innovation ecosystem in low-resource settings.BMJ global health · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedical students and healthcare professionals can benefit from exposure to cross-disciplinary teamwork and core concepts of medical innovation. Indeed, to address complex challenges in patient care, diversity in collaboration across medicine, engineering, business, and design is critical. However, a limited number of academic institutions have established cross-disciplinary opportunities for students and young professionals within these domains to work collaboratively towards diverse healthcare needs.
methodsDrawing upon best practices from computer science and engineering, healthcare hackathons bring together interdisciplinary teams of students and professionals to collaborate, brainstorm, and build solutions to unmet clinical needs. Over the course of six months, a committee of 20 undergraduates, medical students, and physician advisors organized Stanford University's first healthcare hackathon (November 2016). Demographic data from initial applications were supplemented with responses from a post-hackathon survey gauging themes of diversity in collaboration, professional development, interest in medical innovation, and educational value. In designing and evaluating the event, the committee focused on measurable outcomes of diversity across participants (skillset, age, gender, academic degree), ideas (clinical needs), and innovations (projects).
resultsDemographic data (n = 587 applicants, n = 257 participants) reveal participants across diverse academic backgrounds, age groups, and domains of expertise were in attendance. From 50 clinical needs presented representing 19 academic fields, 40 teams ultimately formed and submitted projects spanning web (n = 13) and mobile applications (n = 13), artificial intelligence-based tools (n = 6), and medical devices (n = 3), among others. In post-hackathon survey responses (n = 111), medical students and healthcare professionals alike noted a positive impact on their ability to work in multidisciplinary teams, learn from individuals of different backgrounds, and address complex healthcare challenges.
conclusionsHealthcare hackathons can encourage diversity across individuals, ideas, and projects to address clinical challenges. By providing an outline of Stanford's inaugural event, we hope more universities can adopt the healthcare hackathon model to promote diversity in collaboration in medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.