Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458737›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2018

Rehabilitation of Executive function in Paediatric Traumatic brain injury (REPeaT): protocol for a randomized controlled trial for treating working memory and decision-making.

Nikita Sood, Celia Godfrey, Vicki Anderson, Cathy Catroppa

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikita SoodLevel 4 West, Brain and Mind, Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. nikita.tuli@mcri.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9590-1842
Celia GodfreyLevel 4 West, Brain and Mind, Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Vicki AndersonLevel 4 West, Brain and Mind, Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Cathy CatroppaLevel 4 West, Brain and Mind, Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorking memory allows us to hold information in an active state for short periods of time, and is essential in facilitating goal directed cognitive functioning. Difficulties in working memory and decision-making are common post childhood Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Despite this, there is a paucity of research pertaining to implementation and effectiveness of interventions to reduce these common difficulties which impact significantly on one's ability to function independently. One such intervention, Cogmed Working Memory Training Program, has shown success in improving working memory in other childhood clinical populations, but has received little evaluation in the TBI area. This study aims to evaluate whether Cogmed improves working memory and decision-making post childhood TBI and whether these benefits generalize to functional areas.

methodsThe study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Cogmed (RM version) intervention for children post-TBI. Children aged 7-15 years are initially screened for working memory impairments. Eligible participants are then randomized into either the treatment group (Cogmed) or the active-control group (Lexia Reading). Each group trains online for 50 min each day, 5 days per week, for 5 consecutive weeks. The online training is supported by online clinician meetings each week. Outcome neuropsychological and functional assessments are carried out immediately at the completion of the intervention and at 6 months follow-up. DISCUSSION: This study follows gold standard methodology in intervention research; uses a novel measure of decision-making; measures the effects of intervention on functional outcomes immediately and longer-term post intervention; uses online clinician support in order to allow more families easy access to the program; and promotes the use of technology to improve health services. If efficacious in improving working memory, decision-making, and functional outcomes, our team will then take a key role in implementing Cogmed into clinical care.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000085370 . Trial Registration Date: 16/01/2017. Protocol Version/Date: HREC 35181G/18.08.2017. Study Status: Ongoing.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionDecision MakingMemory, Short-TermAdolescentBrain Injuries, TraumaticChildExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCogmedComputerized cognitive trainingDecision-makingExecutive functionFunctional outcomesInterventionPaediatricRandomized controlled trial (RCT)Traumatic brain injuryWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID30458737
PMCPMC6247519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.