Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458725›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

ASGAL: aligning RNA-Seq data to a splicing graph to detect novel alternative splicing events.

Luca Denti, Raffaella Rizzi, Stefano Beretta, Gianluca Della Vedova, Marco Previtali, Paola Bonizzoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Counting pseudoalignments to novel splicing events.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  8. Alternative splicing analysis benchmark with DICAST.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Shark: fishing relevant reads in an RNA-Seq sample.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Alternative tumour-specific antigens.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luca DentiDepartment of Informatics, Systems, and Communication, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Raffaella RizziDepartment of Informatics, Systems, and Communication, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Stefano BerettaDepartment of Informatics, Systems, and Communication, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca Della VedovaDepartment of Informatics, Systems, and Communication, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Marco PrevitaliDepartment of Informatics, Systems, and Communication, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Paola BonizzoniDepartment of Informatics, Systems, and Communication, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy. bonizzoni@disco.unimib.it.

Funding

Fondazione Cariplo (IT) 2013--0955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the reconstruction of transcripts from a sample of RNA-Seq data is a computationally expensive and complicated task, the detection of splicing events from RNA-Seq data and a gene annotation is computationally feasible. This latter task, which is adequate for many transcriptome analyses, is usually achieved by aligning the reads to a reference genome, followed by comparing the alignments with a gene annotation, often implicitly represented by a graph: the splicing graph.

resultsWe present ASGAL (Alternative Splicing Graph ALigner): a tool for mapping RNA-Seq data to the splicing graph, with the specific goal of detecting novel splicing events, involving either annotated or unannotated splice sites. ASGAL takes as input the annotated transcripts of a gene and a RNA-Seq sample, and computes (1) the spliced alignments of each read in input, and (2) a list of novel events with respect to the gene annotation.

conclusionsAn experimental analysis shows that ASGAL allows to enrich the annotation with novel alternative splicing events even when genes in an experiment express at most one isoform. Compared with other tools which use the spliced alignment of reads against a reference genome for differential analysis, ASGAL better predicts events that use splice sites which are novel with respect to a splicing graph, showing a higher accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, ASGAL is the first tool that detects novel alternative splicing events by directly aligning reads to a splicing graph. AVAILABILITY: Source code, documentation, and data are available for download at http://asgal.algolab.eu .

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingHumansRNARNA SplicingSequence Analysis, RNARNAAlternative splicing eventsGraph alignmentRNA-SeqSpliced alignment

Identifiers

PMID30458725
PMCPMC6247705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.