Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458583›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical statistics2019

Phase II trial design with growth modulation index as the primary endpoint.

Jianrong Wu, Li Chen, Jing Wei, Heidi Weiss, Rachel W Miller, John L Villano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianrong WuDivision of Cancer Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.ORCID 0000-0002-3519-5894
Li ChenDivision of Cancer Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Jing WeiDepartment of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Heidi WeissDivision of Cancer Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Rachel W MillerMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
John L VillanoMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KATHLEEN L. O'CONNOR · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NCI NIH HHS P30CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecularly targeted, genomic-driven, and immunotherapy-based clinical trials continue to be advanced for the treatment of relapse or refractory cancer patients, where the growth modulation index (GMI) is often considered a primary endpoint of treatment efficacy. However, there little literature is available that considers the trial design with GMI as the primary endpoint. In this article, we derived a sample size formula for the score test under a log-linear model of the GMI. Study designs using the derived sample size formula are illustrated under a bivariate exponential model, the Weibull frailty model, and the generalized treatment effect size. The proposed designs provide sound statistical methods for a single-arm phase II trial with GMI as the primary endpoint.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalResearch DesignClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicData Interpretation, StatisticalEndpoint DeterminationHumansImmunotherapyMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsSample SizeTreatment Outcomeaccelerated failure time modelclinical trial designgrowth modulation Indexpaired time-to-progressionsample size

Identifiers

PMID30458583
PMCPMC9335177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.