Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458223›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2019

Diversity and Specificity of Astrocyte-neuron Communication.

Caitlin A Durkee, Alfonso Araque

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
178citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

178 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Connecting the Dots: AMOG/βInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caitlin A DurkeeDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Alfonso AraqueDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: araque@umn.edu.

Funding

Tau-dependent cognitive deficits in alpha-synucleinopathiesR01NS108686 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ARAQUE, ALFONSO, LEE, MICHAEL K · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Astrocyte-neuron interaction in behavior driven by striatal information processingR01NS097312 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ARAQUE, ALFONSO, REDISH, A DAVID · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
Understanding cellular and molecular mechanisms of neurodegenerationR01NS107387 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CVETANOVIC, MARIJA · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NIH HHS R01NS097312NIH HHS R01NS100831NIH HHS R01NS108686NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097312NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS107387NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes are emerging as important players in synaptic function, and, consequently, on brain function and animal behavior. According to the Tripartite Synapse concept, astrocytes are integral elements involved in synaptic function. They establish bidirectional communication with neurons, whereby they respond to synaptically released neurotransmitters and, in turn, release gliotransmitters that influence neuronal and synaptic activity. Accumulating evidence is revealing that the mechanisms and functional consequences of astrocyte-neuron signaling are more complex than originally thought. Furthermore, astrocyte-neuron signaling is not based on broad, unspecific interaction; rather, it is a synapse-, cell- and circuit-specific phenomenon that presents a high degree of complexity. This diversity and complexity of astrocyte-synapse interactions greatly enhance the degrees of freedom of the neural circuits and the consequent computational power of the neural systems.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCell CommunicationHumansNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsOrgan SpecificitySynaptic Transmissionastrocyte–neuron signalingastrocytesgliagliotransmissionsynaptic plasticitysynaptic transmission

Identifiers

PMID30458223
PMCPMC6494094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.