ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018
Spatial Instability: The Paradox of Place Cell Remapping.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remapping revisited: how the hippocampus represents different spaces.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Spontaneous Dynamics of Hippocampal Place Fields in a Model of Combinatorial Competition among Stable Inputs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Hippocampus Maintains a Coherent Map Under Reward Feature-Landmark Cue Conflict.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How do memories persist stably over time when the spatial maps upon which they are constructed are unstable? New insights resolve this paradox by finding coherent structure in the instability of spatial maps arising from dynamic switches in reference frames.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30458150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.