Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458028›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Diversity across major and candidate genes in European local pig breeds.

María Muñoz, Riccardo Bozzi, Fabián García, Yolanda Núñez, Claudia Geraci, Alessandro Crovetti, Juan García-Casco, Estefania Alves, Martin Škrlep, Rui Charneca and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Melanocytic cutaneous lesions inVeterinarni medicina · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic and Phenotypic Characteristics of Belted Pig Breeds: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

María MuñozDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Riccardo BozziUniversità degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Fabián GarcíaDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Yolanda NúñezDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Claudia GeraciDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4948-0725
Alessandro CrovettiUniversità degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Juan García-CascoDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Estefania AlvesDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Martin ŠkrlepKmetijski inštitut Slovenije, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Rui CharnecaInstituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas (ICAAM), Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3597-6746
Jose M MartinsInstituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas (ICAAM), Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Raquel QuintanillaPrograma de Genética y Mejora Animal, IRTA, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan TibauPrograma de Genética y Mejora Animal, IRTA, Barcelona, Spain.
Goran KušecUniversity of Osijek, Faculty of Agrobiotechnical Sciences, Osijek, Croatia.
Ivona Djurkin-KušecUniversity of Osijek, Faculty of Agrobiotechnical Sciences, Osijek, Croatia.
Marie J MercatInstitut du Porc, IFIP, Le Rheu, France.
Juliette RiquetGénétique Physiologie et Système d'Elevage, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Jordi EstelléGABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Christoph ZimmerBäuerliche Erzeugergemeinschaft Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany.
Violeta RazmaiteAnimal Science Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Baisogala, Lithuania.
Jose P AraujoInstituto Politecnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1232-3160
Čedomir RadovićInstitute for Animal Husbandry-Pig Research Department, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia.
Radomir SavićUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of agriculture, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia.
Danijel KarolyiDepartment of animal science, Faculty of agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-0409-9071
Maurizio GalloAssociazione Nazionale Allevatori Suini (ANAS), Roma, Italy.
Marjeta Čandek-PotokarKmetijski inštitut Slovenije, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Luca FontanesiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ana I FernándezDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina ÓviloDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5738-8435
Agricultural institute of Slovenia · SIInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ESUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Évora · PTUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Osijek · HRAgroParisTech · FRANT Foundation Italy Onlus · ITGénétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage · FRInstitut du Porc · FRInstitute for Animal Husbandry · RSLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTPolytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo · PTUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to analyse the distribution of causal and candidate mutations associated to relevant productive traits in twenty local European pig breeds. Also, the potential of the SNP panel employed for elucidating the genetic structure and relationships among breeds was evaluated. Most relevant genes and mutations associated with pig morphological, productive, meat quality, reproductive and disease resistance traits were prioritized and analyzed in a maximum of 47 blood samples from each of the breeds (Alentejana, Apulo-Calabrese, Basque, Bísara, Majorcan Black, Black Slavonian (Crna slavonska), Casertana, Cinta Senese, Gascon, Iberian, Krškopolje (Krškopoljski), Lithuanian indigenous wattle, Lithuanian White Old Type, Mora Romagnola, Moravka, Nero Siciliano, Sarda, Schwäbisch-Hällisches Schwein (Swabian Hall pig), Swallow-Bellied Mangalitsa and Turopolje). We successfully analyzed allelic variation in 39 polymorphisms, located in 33 candidate genes. Results provide relevant information regarding genetic diversity and segregation of SNPs associated to production and quality traits. Coat color and morphological trait-genes that show low level of segregation, and fixed SNPs may be useful for traceability. On the other hand, we detected SNPs which may be useful for association studies as well as breeding programs. For instance, we observed predominance of alleles that might be unfavorable for disease resistance and boar taint in most breeds and segregation of many alleles involved in meat quality, fatness and growth traits. Overall, these findings provide a detailed catalogue of segregating candidate SNPs in 20 European local pig breeds that may be useful for traceability purposes, for association studies and for breeding schemes. Population genetic analyses based on these candidate genes are able to uncover some clues regarding the hidden genetic substructure of these populations, as the extreme genetic closeness between Iberian and Alentejana breeds and an uneven admixture of the breeds studied. The results are in agreement with available knowledge regarding breed history and management, although largest panels of neutral markers should be employed to get a deeper understanding of the population's structure and relationships.

Indexed as

BreedingGenetics, PopulationAnimalsGenotypeMeatPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociSpainSwine

Identifiers

PMID30458028
PMCPMC6245784
OpenAlexW2901943593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.