Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30458001›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Traditional cooking practices and preferences for stove features among women in rural Senegal: Informing improved cookstove design and interventions.

Laura G Hooper, Yakou Dieye, Assane Ndiaye, Aldiouma Diallo, Coralynn S Sack, Vincent S Fan, Kathleen M Neuzil, Justin R Ortiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura G HooperDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Yakou DieyePATH, Dakar, Senegal.
Assane NdiayeVitrome Institute de Recherche pour le Developpement, Dakar, Senegal.
Aldiouma DialloVitrome Institute de Recherche pour le Developpement, Dakar, Senegal.
Coralynn S SackDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Vincent S FanDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Kathleen M NeuzilCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Justin R OrtizCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3138-5965

Funding

University of Washington Education and Research CenterT42OH008433 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER D · 2005 to 2024
$29.4M
NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly half the world's population burns solid fuel for cooking, heating, and lighting. The incomplete combustion of these fuels is associated with detrimental health and environmental effects. The design and distribution of improved cookstoves that increase combustion efficiency and reduce indoor air pollution are a global priority. However, promoting exclusive and sustainable use of the improved stoves has proved challenging. In 2012, we conducted a survey in a community in rural Senegal to describe stove ownership and preferences for different stove technologies. This report aims to describe local stove and fuel use, to identify household preferences related to stove features and function, and to elicit the community perceptions of cleaner-burning stove alternatives with a focus on liquid propane gas. Similar to many resource-limited settings, biomass fuel use was ubiquitous and multiple stoves were used, even when cleaner burning alternatives were available; less than 1% of households that owned a liquid propane stove used it as the primary cooking device. Despite nearly universal use of the traditional open fire (92% of households), women did not prefer this stove when presented with other options. Propane gas, solar, and improved cookstoves were all viewed as more desirable when compared to the traditional open fire, however first-hand experience and knowledge of these stoves was limited. The stove features of greatest value were, in order: large cooking capacity, minimal smoke production, and rapid heating. Despite the low desirability and smoke emisions from the traditional open fire, its pervasive use, even in the presence of alternative stove options, may be related to its ability to satisfy the practical needs of the surveyed cooks, namely large cooking capacity and rapid, intense heat generation. Our data suggest women in this community want alternative stove options that reduce smoke exposure, however currently available stoves, including liquid propane gas, do not address all of the cooks' preferences.

Indexed as

AdultAir Pollution, IndoorConsumer BehaviorCookingFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFiresFossil FuelsHousehold ArticlesHumansRural PopulationSenegalSmokeSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsFossil FuelsSmoke

Identifiers

PMID30458001
PMCPMC6245512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.