ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2018
Generation of transgene-free porcine intermediate type induced pluripotent stem cells.
Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in porcine stem cell research and their applications in agriculture.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Can cell-cultured meat from stem cells pave the way for sustainable alternative protein?Current research in food science · 2025Article
- The progress of induced pluripotent stem cells derived from pigs: a mini review of recent advances.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Efficient derivation of transgene-free porcine induced pluripotent stem cells enables in vitro modeling of species-specific developmental timing.Stem cell reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Species origin of exogenous transcription factors affects the activation of endogenous pluripotency markers and signaling pathways of porcine induced pluripotent stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Influence of Cell Type in In Vitro Induced Reprogramming in Cattle.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Perspectives on scaling production of adipose tissue for food applications.Biomaterials · 2022Article
- Perspectives of pluripotent stem cells in livestock.World journal of stem cells · 2021Review
- Exogenous LIN28 Is Required for the Maintenance of Self-Renewal and Pluripotency in Presumptive Porcine-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- The use of induced pluripotent stem cells in domestic animals: a narrative review.BMC veterinary research · 2020Review
- Induced pluripotent stem cells from farm animals.Journal of animal science · 2020Review
- Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from large domestic animals.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Article
- Oocytes, embryos and pluripotent stem cells from a biomedical perspective.Animal reproduction · 2019Article
- Induced pluripotent stem cells throughout the animal kingdom: Availability and applications.World journal of stem cells · 2019Review
- Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells using an extended pluripotent stem cell culture system.Stem cell research & therapy · 2019Article
- A six-inhibitor culture medium for improving naïve-type pluripotency of porcine pluripotent stem cells.Cell death discovery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physiologically and anatomically, humans and pigs share many similarities, which make porcine induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSCs) very attractive for modeling human cell therapy as well as for testing safety of iPSC based cell replacement therapies. To date, several integrative and non-integrative strategies have been reported to successfully generate piPSCs, but all resulting piPSCs had integration of transgenes. The use of integrative methods has the disadvantage of potential lack of silencing or inappropriate re-activation of these genes during differentiation, as well as uncertainty regarding disruption of important genomic regions caused by integration. In our study, we performed a non-integrative vector based reprogramming approach using porcine fetal fibroblasts. The resulting four piPSC lines were positive for pluripotency marker and when subjected to in vitro and in vivo differentiation assays, all four lines formed embryoid bodies, capable to differentiate into all three germ layers, and three out of the four cell lines formed teratomas. PCR analysis on genomic and plasmid DNA revealed that the episomal vectors were undetectable in six out of eight subclones derived from one of the piPSC lines (piPSC1) above passage 20. These piPSCs could potentially be ideal cell lines for the generation of porcine in vitro and in vivo models. Furthermore, subsequent analyses of our new transgene independent piPSCs could provide novel insights on the genetic and epigenetic necessities to achieve and maintain piPSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.