Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30457223›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum: Practice trends and patient survival.

Sunil W Dutta, Clayton E Alonso, Mark R Waddle, Shiv R Khandelwal, Einsley-Marie Janowski, Daniel M Trifiletti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PHLPP2: A Prognostic Biomarker in Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sunil W DuttaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-3574-6569
Clayton E AlonsoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Mark R WaddleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Shiv R KhandelwalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Einsley-Marie JanowskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Daniel M TrifilettiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-9150-2916
University of Virginia · USJacksonville College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLeverage the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate trends in management of nonmetastatic squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the rectum and their effect on survival for this uncommon tumor. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective data was obtained from the NCDB for patients diagnosed with SCC of the rectum between 2004 and 2014, including cT1-4, cN0-2, cM0 tumors (cohort A, n = 2296). A subgroup analysis was performed on locally advanced tumors (cT1-T2, N+ or cT3, N any, subcohort B, n = 883), treated with chemoradiation (n = 706) or trimodality therapy (n = 177) including chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Pathological complete response rate following neoadjuvant therapy was obtained. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to generate hazard ratios (HR) investigating factors associated with overall survival. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate overall surviving proportion at 5 and 10 years.

resultsThe K-M estimated 5 and 10 year overall survival for stage I disease was 71.3% and 57.8%, respectively; stage II disease was 57.0% and 38.9%, respectively; stage III disease was 57.8% and 41.5%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, higher cT category (P < 0.001) resulted in worse survival. For locally advanced tumors (subcohort B), there was no significant difference in survival between chemoradiation alone compared to trimodality therapy (P = 0.909 on multivariate analysis).

conclusionsMost providers manage locally advanced SCC of the rectum similar to anal cancer, which results in equivalent overall survival and spares patients from the additional morbidity associated with surgical resection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Rectal NeoplasmsYoung AdultcancerchemoradiationNational Cancer Databaseradiationrectalsquamous

Identifiers

PMID30457223
PMCPMC6308063
OpenAlexW2900936243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.