Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456743›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2019

Radon, an invisible killer in Canadian homes: perceptions of Ottawa-Gatineau residents.

Selim M Khan, Daniel Krewski, James Gomes, Raywat Deonandan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond Communication and Risk in a Post-Pandemic World: A Survey on Radon in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Selim M KhanInterdisciplinary Population Health Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 25 University Private, Ottawa, ON, K1N 7K4, Canada. skhan196@uottawa.ca.
Daniel KrewskiSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Room 216A, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
James GomesInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, THN 210, 25 University Private, Ottawa, ON, K1N 7K4, Canada.
Raywat DeonandanFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, THN 209, 25 University Private, Ottawa, ON, K1N 7K4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCanadians have reason to care about indoor air quality as they spend over 90% of the time indoors. Although indoor radon causes more deaths than any other environmental hazard, only 55% of Canadians have heard of it, and of these, 6% have taken action. The gap between residents' risk awareness and adoption of actual protective behaviour presents a challenge to public health practitioners. Residents' perception of the risk should inform health communication that targets motivation for action. In Canada, research about the public perception of radon health risk is lacking. The aim of this study was to describe residents' perceptions of radon health risks and, applying a theoretical lens, evaluate how perceptions correlate with protection behaviours.

methodsWe conducted a mixed online and face-to-face survey (N = 557) with both homeowners and tenants in Ottawa-Gatineau census metropolitan area. Descriptive, correlation, and regression analyses addressed the research questions.

resultsCompared to the gravity of the risk, public perception remained low. While 32% of residents expressed some concern about radon health risk, 12% of them tested and only 3% mitigated their homes for radon. Residents' perceptions of the probability and severity of the risk, social influence, care for children, and smoking in home correlated significantly with their intention to test; these factors also predicted their behaviours for testing and mitigation.

conclusionHealth risk communication programs need to consider the affective aspects of risk perception in addition to rational cognition to improve protection behaviours. A qualitative study can explore the reasons behind the gap between testing and mitigation.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedAir Pollution, IndoorCanadaCause of DeathFemaleHousingHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadonRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultRadonAir pollutionCanadaIndoorPerceptionRadonRisk

Identifiers

PMID30456743
PMCPMC6964609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.