Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456601›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2018

Mechanisms of contractile ring tension production and constriction.

Ben O'Shaughnessy, Sathish Thiyagarajan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben O'ShaughnessyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA. bo8@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4223-3489
Sathish ThiyagarajanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Modeling Contractile Ring Constriction in Fission YeastR01GM086731 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI O'SHAUGHNESSY, BEN · 2010 to 2019
$2.8M
National Institute of General Medical Sciences R01GM086731NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contractile ring is a remarkable tension-generating cellular machine that constricts and divides cells into two during cytokinesis, the final stage of the cell cycle. Since the ring's discovery, the parallels with muscle have been emphasized. Both are contractile actomyosin machineries, and long ago, a muscle-like sliding filament mechanism was proposed for the ring. This review focuses on the mechanisms that generate ring tension and constrict contractile rings. The emphasis is on fission yeast, whose contractile ring is sufficiently well characterized that realistic mathematical models are feasible, and possible lessons from fission yeast that may apply to animal cells are discussed. Recent discoveries relevant to the organization in fission yeast rings suggest a stochastic steady-state version of the classic sliding filament mechanism for tension. The importance of different modes of anchoring for tension production and for organizational stability of constricting rings is discussed. Possible mechanisms are discussed that set the constriction rate and enable the contractile ring to meet the technical challenge of maintaining structural integrity and tension-generating capacity while continuously disassembling throughout constriction.

Indexed as

Actomyosin contractilityAnchoringConstrictionContractile ring tensionCytokinesis

Identifiers

PMID30456601
PMCPMC6297097
OpenAlexW2901678199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.