Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456593›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2019

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis for Assessing Tumor Staging and Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Correlation with p53 and Ki-67 Expression.

Feng Wang, Yuxiang Wang, Yan Zhou, Congrong Liu, Dong Liang, Lizhi Xie, Zhihang Yao, Jianyu Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Feng WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yuxiang WangDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Congrong LiuDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Dong LiangSiemens Ltd., China, 7 Wangjing Zhonghuan Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100102, China.
Lizhi XieGE Healthcare China, 1 Yongchang North Road, Beijing, 100176, China.
Zhihang YaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jianyu LiuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. jyliubysy@163.com.
Peking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNGeneral Electric (Spain) · ESSiemens (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the potential of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram parameters in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) for distinguishing different tumor stages and determining lymph node status and correlations between ADC values and p53 and Ki-67 expression. PROCEDURES: Forty-nine EOC patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Staging and lymph node status were determined postoperatively. ADC values were measured using histogram analysis and compared between groups. Relationships between ADCs and Ki-67 and p53 expression were explored.

resultsDC parameters differed significantly between stage I vs II, I vs III, and I vs IV. The parameters were significantly lower in the lymph node-positive group than in the lymph node-negative group, were significantly negatively correlated with Ki-67 labeling index, and were all significantly lower in the mutation-type p53 group than in the wild-type p53 group.

conclusionsADC histogram analysis can help discriminate stage I from advanced-stage EOC and predict lymph node metastasis. ADC parameters were correlated with Ki-67 labeling index; the parameters may help indicate p53 expression.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsROC CurveTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ki-67 AntigenTumor Suppressor Protein p53Lymph nodesMagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasm metastasisNeoplasm stagingOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID30456593
OpenAlexW2901053717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.