Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456584›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

CT reconstruction algorithms affect histogram and texture analysis: evidence for liver parenchyma, focal solid liver lesions, and renal cysts.

Su Joa Ahn, Jung Hoon Kim, Sang Min Lee, Sang Joon Park, Joon Koo Han

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Reconstruction Algorithm-Based CT Imaging for the Diagnosis of Hepatic Ascites.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. New advances in radiomics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Radiomics with artificial intelligence: a practical guide for beginners.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Su Joa AhnDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Jung Hoon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea. jhkim2008@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-7758
Sang Min LeeDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 22, Gwanpyeong-ro 170beon-gil, Anyang-si, 431-796, Korea.
Sang Joon ParkDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Joon Koo HanDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSacred Heart Hospital · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the effects of different reconstruction algorithms on histogram and texture features in different targets. MATERIALS AND

methodsAmong 3620 patients, 480 had normal liver parenchyma, 494 had focal solid liver lesions (metastases = 259; hepatocellular carcinoma = 99; hemangioma = 78; abscess = 32; and cholangiocarcinoma = 26), and 488 had renal cysts. CT images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), and iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithms. Computerized histogram and texture analyses were performed by extracting 11 features.

resultsDifferent reconstruction algorithms had distinct, significant effects. IMR had a greater effect than HIR. For instance, IMR had a significant effect on five features of liver parenchyma, nine features of focal liver lesions, and four features of renal cysts on portal-phase scans and four, eight, and four features, respectively, on precontrast scans (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, different algorithms had a greater effect on focal liver lesions (six in HIR and nine in IMR on portal-phase, three in HIR, and eight in IMR on precontrast scans) than on liver parenchyma or cysts. The mean attenuation and standard deviation were not affected by the reconstruction algorithm (p > .05). Most parameters showed good or excellent intra- and interobserver agreement, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.634 to 0.972.

conclusionsDifferent reconstruction algorithms affect histogram and texture features. Reconstruction algorithms showed stronger effects in focal liver lesions than in liver parenchyma or renal cysts. KEY POINTS: • Imaging heterogeneities influenced the quantification of image features. • Different reconstruction algorithms had a significant effect on histogram and texture features. • Solid liver lesions were more affected than liver parenchyma or cysts.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHumansKidney Diseases, CysticLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultCystKidneyLiverNeoplasmsTomography

Identifiers

PMID30456584
OpenAlexW2901202399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.