Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456532›Full record

ArticleBehavior genetics2019

Symbiont-Driven Male Mating Success in the Neotropical Drosophila paulistorum Superspecies.

Daniela I Schneider, Lee Ehrman, Tobias Engl, Martin Kaltenpoth, Aurélie Hua-Van, Arnaud Le Rouzic, Wolfgang J Miller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect ofInsects · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Restriction ofmBio · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bacterial Inhibition onFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniela I SchneiderDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Center of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Schwarzspanierstrasse 17, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Lee EhrmanNatural Sciences, State University of New York, Purchase College, Purchase, NY, USA.
Tobias EnglDepartment for Evolutionary Ecology, Institute for Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany.
Martin KaltenpothDepartment for Evolutionary Ecology, Institute for Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany.
Aurélie Hua-VanÉvolution, Génomes, Comportement, Écologie, CNRS, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Arnaud Le RouzicÉvolution, Génomes, Comportement, Écologie, CNRS, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Wolfgang J MillerDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Center of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Schwarzspanierstrasse 17, 1090, Vienna, Austria. wolfgang.miller@meduniwien.ac.at.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMedical University of Vienna · ATState University of New York · USUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRYale University · US

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 22634Austrian Science Fund FWF P 28255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial symbionts are ubiquitous associates of living organisms but their role in mediating reproductive isolation (RI) remains controversial. We addressed this knowledge gap by employing the Drosophila paulistorum-Wolbachia model system. Semispecies in the D. paulistorum species complex exhibit strong RI between each other and knockdown of obligate mutualistic Wolbachia bacteria in female D. paulistorum flies triggers loss of assortative mating behavior against males carrying incompatible Wolbachia strains. Here we set out to determine whether de novo RI can be introduced by Wolbachia-knockdown in D. paulistorum males. We show that Wolbachia-knockdown D. paulistorum males (i) are rejected as mates by wild type females, (ii) express altered sexual pheromone profiles, and (iii) are devoid of the endosymbiont in pheromone producing cells. Our findings suggest that changes in Wolbachia titer and tissue tropism can induce de novo premating isolation by directly or indirectly modulating sexual behavior of their native D. paulistorum hosts.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiological EvolutionDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleMaleReproductionReproductive IsolationSex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalSpecies SpecificitySymbiosisWolbachiaDrosophila ProteinsSex AttractantsDrosophilaPheromonesPremating isolationReproductive isolationWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID30456532
PMCPMC6327003
OpenAlexW2901726674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.