ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019
Modular laser-based endoluminal ablation of the gastrointestinal tract: in vivo dose-effect evaluation and predictive numerical model.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05549960 (Use of Pre-planning Models for the Guidance of the Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Laser Ablation of Pancreatic Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Use of Pre-planning Models for the Guidance of the Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Laser Ablation of Pancreatic Lesions
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organ and function preservation in gastrointestinal cancer: Current and future perspectives on endoscopic ablation.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Non-Fourier Bioheat Transfer Analysis in Brain Tissue During Interstitial Laser Ablation: Analysis of Multiple Influential Factors.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- The LMIT: Light-mediated minimally-invasive theranostics in oncology.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Are gut dysbiosis, barrier disruption, and endotoxemia related to adipose tissue dysfunction in metabolic disorders? Overview of the mechanisms involved.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Review
- Closed-Loop Temperature Control Based on Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors for Laser Ablation of Hepatic Tissue.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection allows for "en bloc" removal of early gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, it is technically demanding and time-consuming. Alternatives could rely on energy-based techniques. We aimed to evaluate a predictive numerical model of thermal damage to preoperatively define optimal laser settings allowing for a controlled ablation down to the submucosa, and the ability of confocal endomicroscopy to provide damage information. MATERIALS AND
methodsA Nd:YAG laser was applied onto the gastric mucosa of 21 Wistar rats on 10 spots (total 210). Power settings ranging from 0.5 to 2.5W were applied during 1-12 s, with a consequent energy delivery varying from 0.5 to 30 J. Out of the 210 samples, a total of 1050 hematoxilin-eosin stained slides were obtained. To evaluate thermal injury, the ratio between the damage depth (DD) over the mucosa and the submucosa thickness (T) was calculated. Effective and safe ablation was considered for a DD/T ratio ≤ 1 (only mucosal and submucosal damage). Confocal endomicroscopy was performed before and after ablation. A numerical model, using human physical properties, was developed to predict thermal damage.
resultsNo full-thickness perforations were detected. On histology, the DD/T ratio at 0.5 J was 0.57 ± 0.21, significantly lower when compared to energies ranging from 15 J (a DD/T ratio = 1.2 ± 0.3; p < 0.001) until 30 J (a DD/T ratio = 1.33 ± 0.31; p < 0.001). Safe mucosal and submucosal ablations were achieved applying energy between 4 and 12 J, never impairing the muscularis propria. Confocal endomicroscopy showed a distorted gland architecture. The predicted damage depth demonstrated a significant positive linear correlation with the experimental data (Pearson's r 0.85; 95% CI 0.66-0.94).
conclusionsLow-power settings achieved effective and safe mucosal and submucosal ablation. The numerical model allowed for an accurate prediction of the ablated layers. Confocal endomicroscopy provided real-time thermal damage visualization. Further studies on larger animal models are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.