Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456471›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2018

[Pain in old age].

Thomas Hubert Cegla, Johannes Horlemann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas Hubert CeglaHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal - Schmerzklinik, Im Saalscheid 5, 42369, Wuppertal, Deutschland. Thomas.Cegla@dgschmerzmedizin.de.
Johannes HorlemannHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal - Schmerzklinik, Im Saalscheid 5, 42369, Wuppertal, Deutschland.
Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of chronic pain increases with increasing age. Multimorbidity increases the risk of disease-related pain. Addressing the problem of pain in higher age is concerned with an increasing problem of care. The multimorbidity and the resulting multimedication are important for the medical care of pain. The therefore necessary physician-patient verbal communication can hardly be remunerated and carried out in the current care landscape. Existing resources must be bundled. The quality of life of older people and not the absence of pain, must be emphasized. Particularly problematic is the recognition and treatment of pain in patients with dementia. Pain in dementia patients is more rarely detected. In addition to questioning relatives and caregivers, a structured pain interview is necessary. The pharmacology of chronic pain is concerned above all with the prevention of iatrogenic risks through interactions and pharmacological complications. The patient-related treatment priorities must be checked and adjusted during the course of treatment. To be considered are age-related altered metabolic pathways. A sensible therapy option is the training of physical activity with a positive effect on the entire pain experience. Behavioral medical treatment procedures are other important building blocks in pain therapy. In addition to the multimodal therapeutic approaches, a stronger interdisciplinary collaboration of special pain medicine and geriatrics is necessary.

Indexed as

AgingPain ManagementQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overGeriatricsHumansMultimorbidityChronic painHealth careInterdisciplinarityMultimorbidityPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID30456471
OpenAlexW2901939859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.