Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456469›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2018

Interpreting the Athlete's ECG: Current State and Future Perspectives.

Joyee Basu, Aneil Malhotra

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Athlete's ECG Made Easy: A Practical Guide to Surviving Everyday Clinical Practice.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Identifying Sudden Cardiac Arrest Risk in Adolescent Male Athletes.International journal of exercise science · 2024
    Article
  10. The Relationship between the Frontal QRS-T Angle on ECG and Physical Activity Level in Young Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. The Impact of Ethnicity on Athlete ECG Interpretation: A Systematic Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joyee BasuCardiology Clinical and Academic Group, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK. jbasu@sgul.ac.uk.
Aneil MalhotraCardiology Clinical and Academic Group, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
St George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of death in athletes. A large proportion of these deaths are associated with undiagnosed cardiovascular disease. Screening for high-risk individuals enables early detection of pathology, as well as permitting lifestyle modification or therapeutic intervention.ECG changes in athletes occur as a result of electrical and structural adaptations secondary to repeated bouts of exercise. Such changes are common and may overlap with patterns suggestive of underlying cardiovascular disease. Correct interpretation is therefore essential, in order to differentiate physiology from pathology. Erroneous interpretation may result in false reassurance or expensive investigations for further evaluation and unnecessary disqualification from competitive sports.Interpretation of the athlete's ECG has evolved over the past 12 years, beginning with the 2005 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) consensus, progressing to the ESC recommendations (2010), Seattle Criteria (2013) and the 'refined' criteria (2014). This evolution culminated in the recently published international recommendations for ECG interpretation in athletes (2017), which has led to a significant reduction in false positives and screening-associated costs. This review aims to describe the evolution of the current knowledge on ECG interpretation as well as future directions.

Indexed as

AthleteConsensusCriteriaECGGuidelinesScreening

Identifiers

PMID30456469
PMCPMC6244896
OpenAlexW2901568994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.