ArticleIntensive care medicine2019
Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring: narrative review and expert panel recommendations from an ESICM task force.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04693923 (Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients: Pathophysiological Determinants, and Relation to Changes in Systemic, Regional and Microcirculatory Blood Flow
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Changes in pulse pressure variation induced by passive leg raising test to predict preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with low tidal volume in ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Controversies in acute kidney injury: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference.Kidney international · 2020 · on this mapGuideline
- Article
- Five things the intensivist cannot forget in the management of septic shock.Critical care science · 2026Article
- Bedside thoracic echography in ICU: new insights for acute circulatory and respiratory failure.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the mitral velocity-time integral changes induced by a passive leg raising test as a marker of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Observational
- Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: Diagnosis, Prognostic Factors, Treatment Strategies, and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to intensive care units after the Kahramanmaras (Türkiye) earthquake: a multicenter observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings: global expert consensus statements using a Delphi method.Intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- Heart-Lungs interactions: the basics and clinical implications.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- Use of stepwise lung recruitment maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness under lung protective ventilation in the operating room.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Are We Always Right? Evaluation of the Performance and Knowledge of the Passive Leg Raise Test in Detecting Volume Responsiveness in Critical Care Patients: A National German Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Critical Care Management of Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and Neurocritical Care Society.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Critical Care Management of Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and Neurocritical Care Society.Circulation · 2024Review
- Effect on capillary refill time of volume expansion and increase of the norepinephrine dose in patients with septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Observational
- Association between diastolic blood pressure during the first 24 h and 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock: a retrospective observational study.European journal of medical research · 2023Observational
- Hemodynamic management of septic shock: beyond the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Simultaneous venous-arterial Doppler during preload augmentation: illustrating the Doppler Starling curve.The ultrasound journal · 2023Article
- Evolving Management Practices for Early Sepsis-induced Hypoperfusion: A Narrative Review.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Review
- A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An international team of experts in the field of fluid resuscitation was invited by the ESICM to form a task force to systematically review the evidence concerning fluid administration using basic monitoring. The work included a particular emphasis on pre-ICU hospital settings and resource-limited settings. The work focused on four main questions: (1) What is the role of clinical assessment to guide fluid resuscitation in shock? (2) What basic monitoring is required to perform and interpret a fluid challenge? (3) What defines a fluid challenge in terms of fluid type, ranges of volume, and rate of administration? (4) What are the safety endpoints during a fluid challenge? The expert panel found insufficient evidence to provide recommendations according to the GRADE system, and was only able to make recommendations for basic interventions, based on the available evidence and expert opinion. The panel identified significant gaps in the scientific evidence on fluid administration outside the ICU (excluding the operating theater). Globally, scientific communities and health care systems should address these critical gaps in evidence through research on how basic fluid administration in resource-rich and resource-limited settings can be improved for the benefit of patients and societies worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30456467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.