Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456365›Full record

ArticleLife science alliance2018

Immunoediting is not a primary transformation event in a murine model of MLL-ENL AML.

Monika Dudenhöffer-Pfeifer, David Bryder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life science alliance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Monika Dudenhöffer-PfeiferDivision of Molecular Hematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
David BryderDivision of Molecular Hematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-4237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is firmly established that endogenous immunity can prevent cancer outgrowth, with a range of immunomodulatory strategies reaching clinical use, most studies on the topic have been restricted to solid cancers. This applies in particular to cancer initiation, where model constraints have precluded investigations of immunosurveillance and immunoediting during the multistep progression into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we used a mouse model where the chimeric transcription factor MLL-ENL can be conditionally activated in vivo as a leukemic "first-hit," which is followed by spontaneous transformation into AML. We observed similar disease kinetics regardless of whether AML developed in WT or immunocompromised hosts, despite more permissive preleukemic environments in the latter. When assessing transformed AML cells from either primary immunocompetent or immunocompromised hosts, AML cells from all sources could be targets of endogenous immunity. Our data argue against immunoediting in response to selective pressure from endogenous immunity as a universal primary transformation event in AML.

Identifiers

PMID30456365
PMCPMC6238415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.