Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456290›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2018

Characterizing heterogeneity in the progression of Alzheimer's disease using longitudinal clinical and neuroimaging biomarkers.

Devendra Goyal, Donna Tjandra, Raymond Q Migrino, Bruno Giordani, Zeeshan Syed, Jenna Wiens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Pathway enrichment in genome-wide analysis of longitudinal Alzheimer's disease biomarker endophenotypes.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Predicting clinical progression trajectories of early Alzheimer's disease patients.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Early prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias using real-world electronic health records.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Heterogeneity in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Progression Rates: Implications for Therapeutic Trials.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Devendra GoyalComputer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Donna TjandraComputer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Raymond Q MigrinoPhoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Bruno GiordaniNeuropsychology Section, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Zeeshan SyedSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jenna WiensComputer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG053760 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALBIN, ROGER L · 2016 to 2020
$10.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG053760NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionModels characterizing intermediate disease stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are needed to inform clinical care and prognosis. Current models, however, use only a small subset of available biomarkers, capturing only coarse changes along the complete spectrum of disease progression. We propose the use of machine learning techniques and clinical, biochemical, and neuroimaging biomarkers to characterize progression to AD.

methodsWe used a large multimodal longitudinal data set of biomarkers and demographic and genotype information from 1624 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Using hidden Markov models, we characterized intermediate disease stages. We validated inferred disease trajectories by comparing time to first clinical AD diagnosis. We trained an L2-regularized logistic regression model to predict disease trajectory and evaluated its discriminative performance on a test set.

resultsWe identified 12 distinct disease states. Progression to AD occurred most often through one of two possible paths through these states. Paths differed in terms of rate of disease progression (by 5.44 years on average), amyloid and total-tau (t-tau) burden (by 10% and 69%, respectively), and hippocampal neurodegeneration ( DISCUSSION: Progression to AD, in terms of biomarker trajectories, can be predicted based on participant-specific factors. Such disease staging tools could help in targeting high-risk patients for therapeutic intervention trials. As longitudinal data with richer features are collected, such models will help increase our understanding of the factors that drive the different trajectories of AD.

Indexed as

BiomarkersLongitudinalMachine learningStagingTrajectory

Identifiers

PMID30456290
PMCPMC6234900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.