ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2018
Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Based Myocardial Segmentation and Attenuation Mapping Improved Detection of Myocardial Ischemia and Infarction on Emergency CT Angiography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Incidental Myocardial Perfusion Defects on Non-ECG-Gated Contrast-Enhanced CT in Emergency Settings.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- PE MIMICS: a structured approach for the emergency radiologist in the evaluation of chest pain.Emergency radiology · 2022Article
- Current Role of Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Coronary Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Machine learning-based CT fractional flow reserve assessment in acute chest pain: first experience.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesTo evaluate the frequency and relevance of hypodense myocardium (HM) encountered in patients undergoing chest-pain CT in the emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this IRB-approved retrospective study, ECG-gated chest-pain CT examinations of 300 consecutive patients (mean age 60 ± 17 years) presenting with acute chest-pain to our ED were evaluated. Once ST-segment elevation infarction was excluded, chest-pain CT including the coronary arteries (rule-out acute coronary syndrome (ACS), pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute aortic syndrome (AAS): chest-pain CT
resultsHM was identified in 27/300 patients (9%): 12/179 in chest-pain CT
conclusionHM indicating acute MI are often encountered in chest pain CT in the ED, also in chest-pain CT
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.