Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30456119›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2017

Percutaneous coronary intervention still not accessible for many South Africans.

Willem Stassen, Lee Wallis, Craig Lambert, Maaret Castren, Lisa Kurland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A prehospital randomised controlled trial in South Africa: Challenges and lessons learnt.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Willem StassenDivision of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lee WallisDivision of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Craig LambertDepartment of Emergency Medical Care, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Maaret CastrenDepartment of Clinical Research and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lisa KurlandDepartment of Clinical Research and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEHelsinki University Hospital · FIStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Johannesburg · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe incidence of myocardial infarction is rising in Sub-Saharan Africa. In order to reduce mortality, timely reperfusion by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or thrombolysis followed by PCI is required. South Africa has historically been characterised by inequities in healthcare access based on geographic and socioeconomic status. We aimed to determine the coverage of PCI-facilities in South Africa and relate this to access based on population and socio-economic status.

methodsThis cross-sectional study obtained data from literature, directories, organisational databases and correspondence with Departments of Health and hospital groups. Data was analysed descriptively while Spearman's Rho sought correlations between PCI-facility resources, population, poverty and medical insurance status.

resultsSouth Africa has 62 PCI-facilities. Gauteng has the most PCI-facilities (n = 28) while the Northern Cape has none. Most PCI-facilities (n = 48; 77%) are owned by the private sector. A disparity exists between the number of private and state-owned PCI-facilities when compared to the poverty (r = 0.01; p = 0.17) and insurance status of individuals (r = -0.4; p = 0.27).

conclusionFor many South Africans, access to PCI-facilities and primary PCI is still impossible given their socio-economic status or geographical locale. Research is needed to determine the specific PCI-facility needs based on geographic and epidemiological aspects, and to develop a contextualised solution for South Africans suffering a myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

Healthcare accessMyocardial infarctionSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID30456119
PMCPMC6234190
OpenAlexW2606627315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.