ArticleClinical case reports2018
Diagnostic pitfalls for
Article in Clinical case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- GJB2-Related Hearing Loss: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, Natural History, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Novel 1259 bp Intragenic Deletion in theAudiology research · 2025Article
- The known structural variations in hearing loss and their diagnostic approaches: a comprehensive review.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- A Chemical Chaperone Restores Connexin 26 Mutant Activity.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023Article
- 3D Chromatin Organization Involving MEIS1 Factor in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Evaluation of copy number variants for genetic hearing loss: a review of current approaches and recent findings.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Diagnostic pitfalls forClinical case reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, we report a novel deletion (copy number variation: CNV) in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.