ArticleJournal of atrial fibrillation
Atrioventricular Nodal Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Congestive Heart Failure.
Article in Journal of atrial fibrillation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of atrial fibrillation (AF) during the course of the evolution of heart failure (HF) worsens the clinical outcomes and the prognosis accounting for an enormous economic burden on healthcare. AF is considered to be an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality increasing the risk of death and hospitalization in 76% in HF patients. Despite the good clinical results obtained with conventional pharmacological agents and different new drugs, the optimal medical treatment can fail in the intention to improve symptoms and quality of life of HF patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and AF with uncontrolled ventricular rate. Therefore, the necessity to utilize cardiac devices to perform cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), or the need to use catheter ablation, or both, emerges facing the failure of optimal medical treatment in order to achieve hemodynamic improvement. Some of these AF patients will require atrio-ventricular nodal (AVN) catheter ablation in order to restore 100% CRT functionality and improvements in clinical outcomes. It is hard to imagine that the deliberate destruction of a natural and normally functional specialized tissue of the main conduction system of the heart would do any good. However, in the presence of AF with rapid ventricular response due to normal conduction through the AV node in HF patients, the fast ventricular rate can cause deleterious consequences in the clinical outcome. Moreover, there are interesting published data which will be analyzed in this manuscript documenting significant acute and long-term improvement in left ventricular function, symptoms, exercise tolerance, clinical outcomes, and quality of life in selected HF patients with paroxysmal and persistent drug-refractory AF who have undergone AVN ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.